Evidence-based Resources in Current and Alternative Therapies
Compiled by: Constantine Kaniklidis, medical researcher


Home Heart Watch:  Evidence-based Treatment of Cardiovascular Disorders [updated: 8/03/2005]

Cardiology: Resources


  
   Anticoagulation


   Atrial Fibrillation


   Cholesterol (High Lipids)


   Congestive Hear Failure


   Hypertension


   Mitral Valve Prolapse


   Varicose Veins (VV)

Cardiology Topics



  • Lp(a) Lipoprotein and Cardiovascular Risk:
    The HOPE, PROGRESS and, more recently, EUROPA studies have examined the effects of preventive treatment with ACE inhibitors in normotensive high-risk patients. In the HOPE study, patients with CHD, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, or diabetes
    (types 1 or 2) and an additional risk factor were randomly allocated to receive ramipril 10mg daily or placebo. Patients were included
    irrespective of a history of hypertension, but those with blood pressure greater than 140/90mmHg or with a specific indication
    for treatment with an ACE inhibitor (eg, CCF) were excluded. The 3/1mmHg lower blood pressure in the ramipril group at the end of
    the study was unlikely to explain the highly significant 22%. reduction in the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, stroke
    or heart attack (cardiovascular death [26% reduction; ARR, 2.0%], stroke [32% reduction; ARR, 1.5%], heart attack [20% reduction; ARR, 2.2%]; P < 0.05) or the 17% decrease in total mortality (P < 0.05).1

    In the PROGRESS study,2 patients with a previous history of stroke or TIA were randomly allocated to perindopril 4mg ± indapamide 2.5mg versus placebo, whether there was a history of hypertension or not. When given together this combination reduced the risk of recurrent stroke (fatal or non-fatal) and major vascular events in both normotensive and hypertensive patients with this background.2 There was also a significant reduction in major coronary events (26%) and the development of heart failure (26%) in these patients with underlying cerebrovascular disease.17 The magnitude of blood pressure reduction in the active treatment group was greater in the PROGRESS study (9/4mmHg) than in the HOPE study (3/1mmHg), making it less clear as to how much of the benefit seen in the PROGRESS study was independent of blood pressure reduction alone.

    The recently published EUROPA study16 looked at patients with known ischaemic heart disease, and participants were randomly
    allocated to receive perindopril 8mg or placebo, independent of whether or not they had a history of hypertension. At 5 years, there
    was a significant 20% reduction in cardiovascular mortality, infarction and cardiac arrest in patients who received perindopril, with a
    blood pressure difference of 5/2mmHg between the groups. It appears that, in patients with a history of CHD or cerebrovascular
    disease, treatment with a high dose ramipril- or perindopril based regimen will improve outcomes whether or not there is a history of hypertension, and that at least some of these benefits are independent of blood pressure reduction alone. In the immediate post-infarct management of normotensive patients, a mortality benefit in the short term has also been demonstrated with â-blockers18 and ACE inhibitors (particularly in patients with associated heart failure),19 with less robust evidence for calcium channel blockers, verapamil and diltiazem.20-22


  • Lp(a) Lipoprotein and Cardiovascular Risk:
    Among older adults in the United States, an elevated level of Lp(a) lipoprotein is an independent predictor of stroke, death from vascular disease, and death from any cause in men but not in women. These data support the use of Lp(a) lipoprotein levels in predicting the risk of these events in older men (Ariyo et al., N Engl J Med (2003): Lp(a) Lipoprotein, Vascular Disease, and Mortality in the Elderly).

    However, Saely et al. (NEJM Letter) suggest that the failure of the Ariyo study to find Lp(a) predictive of coronary artery disease, despite is status as an atherosclerotic and prothrombotic risk factor may be that patients with established coronary heart disease were excluded from the Ariyo study. In an accompanying perspective, Angelo M. Scanu, MD, notes that the risk associated with high Lp(a) lipoprotein levels varies with genetic and environmental factors. "High plasma levels of Lp(a) lipoprotein may have different implications in different persons — a fact that indicates the need to evaluate patients on an individual basis," Dr. Scanu writes. "From the therapeutic standpoint, until specific and safe agents with the capacity to lower the plasma levels of Lp(a) lipoprotein are identified, the focus should be on the correctable factors. For example, in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, niacin may be beneficial in effecting a shift in Lp(a) lipoprotein from the small, dense particles to the relatively benign, large particles, along with a parallel shift within the class of LDL."


  • Optimal INR:
    Several recent findings have critically clarified the optimal range of anticoagulation required to avoid excess mortality. A seminal study in BMJ, Oral Anticoagulation and Risk of Death (click to read), concludes (1) that a narrower therapeutic window of INR between 2.2 - 2.3 is more optimal than that commonly used, irrespective of treatment indication, and associated with the lowest risk of death for all indications; and (2) that more preventive actions need be taken to avoid episodes of high INR. Evidencewatch believes this finding should alter clinical practice and future evidence-based guidelines for anticoagulation treatment. See the Evidencewatch section on Anticoagulation in our Cardiology topic for this and further studies.


  • Hawthorn for (CHF) Chronic Heart Failure:
    A recent meta-analysis (Pittler et al., Am J Med: Hawthorn extract for treating chronic heart failure: meta-analysis of randomized trials) of patients exhibiting NYHA CFS classes I to III has found " . . . a significant benefit from hawthorn extract as an adjunctive treatment for chronic heart failure" (maximum workload, pressure-heart rate product, dyspnea and fatigue showed clinical benefit), with few, mild, and transient adverse events). This confirms earlier studies of the cardio-protective effect of Hawthrorn extract (Degenring et al., Phytomedicine (2003): A randomised double blind placebo controlled clinical trial of a standardised extract of fresh Crataegus berries (Crataegisan®) in the treatment of patients with congestive heart failure NYHA II); and Schröder et al., Eur J Heart Fail (2003):
    Efficacy of a homeopathic Crataegus preparation compared with usual therapy for mild (NYHA II) cardiac insufficiency: results of an observational cohort study), which concluded that hawthorn extract was non-inferior to usual ACE inhibitor/diuretics treatment for mild cardiac insufficiency on all parameters except BP reduction).

    In addition, Habs (Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd (2004):
    Prospective, Comparative Cohort Studies and Their Contribution to the Benefit Assessments of Therapeutic Options: Heart Failure Treatment with and without Hawthorn Special Extract WS 1442) reports on the WISO cohort study (Efficacy and socio-economic relevance of treatment of chronic heart failure stage NYHA II with Crataegus extract WS® 1442) which compared two different therapeutic strategies in the treatment of heart failure stage NYHA II, i.e. a conventional medication (the comparative cohort) and a therapy which also includes hawthorn special extract in addition to chemical-synthetic drugs (the Crataegus cohort). WS 1442 is a standardized extract (5:1) of hawthorn leaves and flowers, standardized to contain 18.75% oligomeric procyanidins (produced by the Dr. Wilmar Schwabe Co., Karlsruhe, Germany). The study found favourable effects on clinical symptoms despite the fact that the patients in the Crataegus cohort received markedly fewer chemical-synthetic drugs than the patients in the comparative cohort (ACE-inhibitors: 36 vs. 54%, cardiac glycosides: 18 vs. 37%, diuretics: 49 vs. 61%, and beta-blockers: 22 vs. 33%), establishing a clear benefit for patients with heart failure stage NYHA II treated with hawthorn extract, with monotherpay or addon administration in addition to a chemical-synthetic medicationdemonstrating objective improvements at comparable costs.


  • Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10):
    Evidencewatch notes that the anti-oxidant Coenzyme Q10 has also demonstrated efficay and benefit in cardiovascular disease, especially hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and heart failure (see the recent review: Sarter, J Cardiovasc Nurs:
    Coenzyme Q10 and cardiovascular disease), confirming earlier findings (Wilburn et al. (J Clin Hypertens (2004): The Natural Treatment of Hypertension); Tran et al. (Pharmacotherapy (2001): Role of Coenzyme Q10 in Chronic Heart Failure, Angina, and Hypertension)).

    In addition, the AACE (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists) Nutrition Guideines Task Force has recently issued their evidence-based AACE Medical Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Dietary Supplements and Nutraceuticals [pdf]; or see the National Guideline Clearinghouse summary) and found that "Coenzyme Q10 (COQ10) has beneficial effects for mitochondrial disorders, congestive heart failure (CHF), and ischemia-reperfusion injury", although no persuasive research findings to date support its use for hypertension. (The same AACE Nutrition Guidelines Task Force has assessed the amino acid carnitine, concluding that "trials of carnitine used in the tratment of CHF are emerging and appear encouraging . . . similar results have been noted in the treatment of cardiac and peripheral vascular ischemic disease").

    Note that despite scattered wholly unproven warnings, the literature, searched exhaustively across all major medical databases in various languages, is devoid of any evidence or published study re any clinical interaction or interference between Hawthorn and/or CoQ10 and anticoagulants, including warfarin/coumadin and the studies cited above likewise found no clinical significant interaction.

    Re hypertension, it is thought that CoQ10 may lower blood pressure by correcting an endogenous provitamin deficiency (Tran et al., Pharmacotherapy (2001): Role of coenzyme Q10 in chronic heart failure, angina, and hypertension; see also Burke et al., South Med J (2001):
    Randomized, dou-ble-blind, placeo-controlled trial of coenzyme Q10 in isolated systolic hypertension). Recently, Wilburn et al. (J Clin Hypertens (2004): The Natural Treatment of Hypertension) have sytematically appraised the literature on CoQ10 and hypertension, finding some significant evidence for its blood pressure lowering benefits.


  • Fatty Acids:

    (1) ALA: Alpha-linolenic Acid:

    It has been determined that alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), an essential fatty acids in human, like other n-3 fatty acids from marine origin, may prevent cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. De Lorgeril & Salen (Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis (2004):
    Alpha-linolenic acid and coronary heart disease) in a recent review concluded that epidemiological studies and dietary trials in humans suggest that alpha-linolenic acid is a major cardio-protective nutrient; major sources of ALA are canola oil (and canola-oil based margarine), nuts, ground linseeds and green leafy vegetables, with the optimal dietary intake being approx. 2 g per day.

    (2) Omega-3 Fatty Acids in the Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease:

    Evidence from epidemiologic studies and human intervention trials supports a role for n-3 fatty acids in the prevention of CHD. The role of n-3 fatty acids in the secondary prevention of CHD is clearly supported by recent randomized clinical trials including the GISSI Prevenzione Study (Lancet (1999):
    Dietary supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E after myocardial infarction: results of the GISSI-Prevenzione Trial) and the Lyon Diet Heart Study (De Lorgeril et al., Circulation (1999): Mediterranean diet, traditional risk factors, and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocardial infarction). In addition, Marchioli et al. (Circulation (2002): Early Protection Against Sudden Death by n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids After Myocardial Infarction: Time-Course Analysis of the Results of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI)-Prevenzione) concluded that the early effect of low-dose (1 g/daily) n-3 PUFAs on total mortality and sudden death supports the hypothesis of an antiarrhythmic effect; independently, Singer and Wurth (Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids (2004): Can n-3 PUFA reduce cardiac arrhythmias? Results of a clinical trial) found confirmed an antiarrhythmic action of n-3 PUFA . This is in substantial agreement with the findings of the cardioprotective effects of a Mediterranean diet (see the recent systematic review of Panagiotakis et al., Med Sci Monit (2004): Can a Mediterranean diet moderate the development and clinical progression of coronary heart disease? A systematic review [pdf]). In sum, these studies clearly demonstrate a reduction in sudden cardiac death, strongly suggesting an antiarrhythmic effect, associated with optimal n-3 fatty acid consumption, and hence "n-3 fatty acids should be considered a new important adjunct to existing cardiovascular prevention strategies" (Covington, Am Fam Physician (2004): Omega-3 fatty acids), in agreement with the work of Erkkilä et al., among others (Am J Clin Nutr (2003): n-3 Fatty acids and 5-y risks of death and cardiovascular disease events in patients with coronary artery disease) who conclude that ALA, EPA, and DHA are nutritional factors that could potentially reduce the risk of death in patients with CAD".

    The American Heart Association's latest recommendations (American Heart Association Nutrition Committee: Fish consumption, fish oil, omega-3 fatty acids, and cardiovascular disease) are that patients without documented CHD should eat at least two servings of fatty fish per week along with other foods rich in omega-3 fatty acids, while those with CHD should consume at least one daily meal that includes a fatty fish, or in the alternative use a daily fish oil supplement for a recommended level of 0.9 g per day of EPA. Given that typical commercial fish oil supplements of 1g contain 180 mg of EPA + 120 mg of DHA, it would require three 1g capsules daily in divided doses to achieve the recommended dosage of 0.9g of omega-3 fatty acids. Note however that the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia the effective dose is substantially higher, at 2 to 4 g per day.


    Given that low intakes or blood levels of (EPA (
    eicosapentaenoic acid) + DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) are independently associated with increased risk of death from coronary heart disease (CHD), coupled with the fact that red blood cell (RBC) fatty acid (FA) composition reflects long-term intake of EPA + DHA, Harris and von Schacky () have proposed that the RBC EPA + DHA, we they call the Omega-3 Index, be considered a new risk factor for death from CHD.

    Warnings:
    (1) The RCT study of Burr et al. (Eur J Clin Nutr 2003):
    Lack of benefit of dietary advice to men with angina: results of a controlled trial) found that men consuming oily fish (two portions per week), and particularly those supplied with fish oil capsules (three daily), had a higher risk of cardiac death; they observe that this result is unexplained and may arise fromother confounding factors and influences. However, methodological problems arose in connection with this trial: compliance was assessed only in a very small subgroup, and the trial was interrupted; to date, independent confirmation is lacking of an adverse effect of such consumption, especially on angina.
    (2) A second issue arises in connection with ALA: Brouwer et al. (J Nutr (2004):
    Dietary alpha-linolenic acid is associated with reduced risk of fatal coronary heart disease, but increased prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis) have found that epidemiologic studies show an increased risk of prostate cancer in men with a high intake or blood level of ALA.
    (3) Landmark & Aursnes (Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2004):
    Mercury, fish, fish oil and the risk of cardiovascular disease) haveconfirmed that fish intake is a major source of exposure to mercury, and a high mercury content probably inhibits the beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acids on the development of coronary artery disease.

    (3) Linolenic Acid:
    Although it is known that dietary intake of linolenic acid is associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease mortality, the mechanism for this benefit has been until recently poorly understood. This has now been clarifiied by Djoussé et al. (Am J Clin Nutr (2003):
    Dietary linolenic acid is inversely associated with plasma triacylglycerol: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study) where it was found that total linolenic acid consumption is inversely related to plasma triacylglycerol concentrations, suggesting this effect as the critical pathway for the reduction of cardiovascular disease risk.

    Consumer Information:
    ConsumerLab recently issued a detailed evaluation of fatty acids from the consumer (products, brands, layman-orientation) perspective (ConsumerLab (2004):
    Omega-3 Fatty Acids (EPA and DHA) from Fish/Marine Oils).

  • Statins and Stroke Prevention:
    Briel et al. (Am J Med (2004):
    Effects of statins on stroke prevention in patients with and without coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials) examined whether lipid-lowering interventions using statins (also studied were fibrates, resins, n-3 fatty acids, diet) prevent nonfatal and fatal strokes in patients, with and without coronary heart disease, concluding in their meta-analysis that statins reduce the incidence of stroke in patients both in the presence and absence of coronary heart disease.


  • L-Arginine and Congestive Heart Failure:
    Bednarz et al. (Kardiol Pol (2004):
    L-arginine supplementation prolongs duration of exercise in congestive heart failure) found that in patients with chronic stable CHF, supplementation with moderate dose of L-arginine () prolongs exercise duration, probably due to peripheral vasodilation, unloading the heart and improved perfusion of working muscles.


  • Herbal/Warfarin Interaction:
    Correcting the Record: Recently there have been several scattered incidents purported to demonstrate a clinically significant interaction between warfarin treatment and various herbals, among them the anti-oxidant Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) and Ginkgo biloba. However, a recent study (Engelsen et al., Ugeskr Laeger: Effect of Coenzyme Q10 and Ginkgo biloba on warfarin dosage in patients on long-term warfarin treatment. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial) has found that Coenzyme Q10 and Ginkgo biloba do not influence the clinical effect of warfarin. However, St, John's Wort (at a dose of 900mg/daily), in contrast, has been shown to increase the metabolism of warfarin through its action on the cytochrome P450 pathways, leading to the lowering of the INR. P450 induction has also been demonstrated for diets rich in broccoli and Brussels sprouts.
    Evidencewatch notes however that many other claimed interactions between anticoagulants and herbals are founded solely on anecdotal single- or limited case reports, often lacking critical detail to establish causal relationship.