|
|
Current Issue |
ARTICLES
Jews,
Arabs Turn
Conflict to Dialogue at U.C. Forum On a A
Call For An Escalation of Nonviolence
Peacebuilding
in the Balkans: Ignoring a Potentially Dangerous Situation on the Edge
of
Charles David Tauber, MD.
Head
of
Mission, Coalition for Work with Psychotrauma and Peace
The situation in
eastern Croatia, western Serbia
(Vojvodina) and northern Bosnia is getting worse. Unless
cogent strategies for recovery,
reintegration and further advancement are developed and financed, the
area will
deteriorate into violence sooner or later. The Coalition
for Work With Psychotrauma and
Peace (CWWPP) has been working in the region on psychological
trauma,
non-violent conflict resolution and reconciliation and the development
of civil
society since 1995. The CWWPP has developed local capacity through
mentoring
local groups, by counseling clients as groups and individuals and by
intervening in threatening situations. The author
of this article is a physician with experience with asylum seekers and
refugees
who has served as the Head of Mission of the CWWPP since its inception. The region
in which the CWWPP works comprises eastern Croatia, western Vojvodina
(Serbia
and Montenegro) and northern Bosnia. Through
history, this area has been a meeting point of
cultures. Before
the 1991-1995 war, there were at least 25 different ethnic groups and
at least
10 religions present here. The area is rich agriculturally. Before the
war,
industry flourished. Yet, in
this paradise, the war began. “Truth”
and “history” become relative terms. It is difficult to give a neutral
account
of what happened and why. What is certain is that forces from above on
all
sides, through strong use of the media, awakened prejudices that had
lain
dormant since the end of the Second World War and that had been
repressed by
the Tito regime. People who had barely realized their ethnicity were
reminded
of it when they tried to cross checkpoints or when they were fired from
their
jobs or when physically harassed. Neighbors who had lived together for
decades
became enemies, and families separated on ethnic lines. People in mixed
marriages had to choose for one side or the other.
Inhumane
acts were committed on all sides. Today,
each side sees itself as the victim. In reality, on all sides there are
both
victims and perpetrators. Unfortunately, there was only a small amount
of
resistance to the warlords, as the cultures here teach obedience rather
than
individual responsibility. The
immediate post-war situation was not much better. The
regimes that had controlled the region
during the war on all sides remained. Although the large weapons were
quiet,
the tension continued. The bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, particularly
the
bombing outside Kosovo itself, encouraged old hatreds. The
current situation on the ground is disastrous. Unemployment is around
90%.
There are substantial numbers of mines throughout the area. However,
there are even greater problems. The first is that of politics. Since
the
beginning of the war, politicians have manipulated the population to
their own
ends through the media and other methods. One example of this is the
use of
missing persons. People are invited a number of times to the uncovering
of mass
graves where they may or may not find their fathers, brothers,
husbands, even
when there is little chance that the person in question will be found.
This
incites anger and ethnic division. Another
example is the treatment of veterans. Many veterans have physical and
psychological difficulties. How they get their pensions and how they
are (not)
reintegrated into society has everything to do with politics and little
to do
with benefit to them. This group is extremely disappointed in society. These feelings are also subject to
manipulation. Because most veterans still have substantial quantities
of
weapons, this is a dangerous group. The
attitudes toward the International War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague
(ICTY) are
also manipulated. While current governments more or less cooperate with
the
ICTY, other forces appeal to nationalism. This is highly dangerous, and
triggers strong psychological reactions. Nationalism is still very
strong and must be reckoned with
within all of
these societies. In the winter of 2002-2003, a pop singer in Another
very strong force in all of these cultures is obedience to and fear of
authority. Previous regimes were repressive. Some dissent was
tolerated, but
both the person who disobeyed and his/her family could be endangered if
dissent
was too great. Such fears are still strongly present degree. Obedience
and
“group spirit” were highly propagandized and taken as a common good.
There is
thus little sense of individual responsibility among most people. Another
related problem is that of initiative. Under the previous regimes, all
requirements for existence were provided. There was little reason for
initiative. Further, the repression discussed in the last paragraph
discouraged
it. Thus, non-governmental organizations did not exist until recently,
and
civil initiative was virtually unknown. Related to
this are attitudes toward work. Under the previous system, people were
not
dedicated to their work but did it almost as drones. Thus, frequently,
quality
of work and working habits are poor. The international community, has
done
nothing to improve this and, in some cases, has worsened the situation. The war
provided traumatic experience to virtually the entire population of the
region.
There has been the loss of family and friends, property, roles in
society and
of a way of life. There has been little processing of these losses and
little
mourning for them. In addition, previous
traumas, such as those of World War II, have never been dealt with, and
are
still in the psychological systems of many people, directly and through
transmission from older generations. This leads to depression, anxiety,
aggression and other psychological problems, including substance abuse,
notably
of drugs prescribed by physicians, and domestic violence.
There are high levels of suicide. This also
leads to physical health problems such as heart attacks and strokes,
gastrointestinal problems, endocrine problems such as diabetes mellitus
and
thyroid problems and even cancer. There is inadequate professional
capacity to
deal with these problems and therefore they are handled with drugs,
which leads
to addiction. Obviously, such mental and physical health problems form
barriers
to reconciliation and to economic and social recovery. There
seems to be little understanding of these problems at local, national
and even
international level, and there is little political will to deal with
them. Unfortunately, little work on
reconciliation
has been done in this region. The work
that has been done is superficial, and has mostly consisted of short
seminars.
Again, there seems to be little understanding of the processes at any
level and
even less will to deal with them in a substantive way. With a
very few exceptions, the NGOs in the region are struggling to survive
from
month to month. As an example, our organization, which is one of the
very few
providing psychological counseling and training in the region, at the
time of
writing (the beginning of August, 2003) has enough money to exist until
the
beginning of September. This struggle takes NGOs away from other, more
important work. Furthermore, most NGOs do not have basic fundraising or
office
organizational skills. As has
been mentioned, local, national and international authorities seem to
have
little understanding of the processes involved and of their long-term
nature
and the depth of the problems. Funding and encouragement has been
short-term
and superficial. It has led to the disappearance of a large number of
NGOs and
to constant existential threats to almost all others. The total effect
has been
stasis and regression of the situation. Solutions
to these problems are not difficult to devise. There must be good needs
assessments, and research and evaluation must be integral parts of such
programs. As one simple example of how
this has not been done, there has been no epidemiology of either mental
or
physical health. Further,
all members of the community must be actively engaged in discussing
their
problems and determining their future. Action
research would seem to be a tool to accomplish
these aims, but
has rarely been used. People must be
trained to deal with their own problems, that is, peer work groups. The plan
must be integrated, that is, include work on psychology, civil society,
non-violent conflict resolution, economics, education and other fields.
All
levels from grassroots groups to more formal NGOs, both local and
international, IGOs and local and national and even foreign governments
must be
involved in the plan. The plan must work at at least the levels of the
individual, the family, the group and the community.
The plan and its implementation must be
flexible enough to respond to the specific and changing situation in
the
community. It must be long-term. In areas such as this, five years would seem
to be a minimum. We have
referred to the ideas above as the Strategy of Complex Rehabilitation.
Strategies such as this one must be adequately financed.
If compared to the amounts spent on other,
far less effective measures, the costs are not high. Areas such
as These articles and opinions of
the authors do not constitute the endorsement of Nonviolent Change nor
its publisher, Organization Development Institute, or any of its staff,
nor of CirclePoint which is housing the Nonviolent Change Journal. Permissions: Reposting and reprints are encouraged, as long as proper source acknowledgement is given. As a courtesy, please let us know that you are reprinting or electronically reposting. It helps us know of the interest level. Thank you. |