|
Big Oil's
reluctance to invest more of its vast resources into the green space is a
function of its vision. It is seeking to meet global oil demand while at
the same time protecting its shareholders by focusing on the development of
fossil fuels.
Any
evolution in that thinking will only occur if there is a fundamental change
in global carbon policies and particularly those of the United States.
Even though the Obama administration is aggressively pushing for greater
fuel diversity, the oil industry is sticking closely to its core
competencies and in some cases, reducing its investment in wind and solar
power.
"Hydrocarbons
are the most plentiful and economic forms of energy that we have,"
says David O'Reilly, chief executive of Chevron, at an industry conference.
"And the fact is, even if the use of renewable sources doubles or
triples over the next 24 years, we will still depend on fossil fuels for
more than 80 percent of global energy demand."
The U.S.
Department of Energy projects global oil demand to rise to 118 million
barrels a day by 2030. That's compared to the roughly 85 million barrels
demanded today by consumers. The oil giants allocate 5 percent or so of
their capital budgets on exploration. A tiny fraction of those resources,
by contrast, is spent on developing green energy.
Shell Oil
Co., for example, has allocated capital to wind and solar but has recently
sold off some projects. BP, meanwhile, is cutting back. According to the
American Council on Renewable Energy the oil industry has invested about 10
percent of what the venture capital community has in renewable energy since
1995. That equates to about $5 billion of the $50 billion invested by risk
takers.
None of
this suggests that the oil sector is totally disinterested. ExxonMobil and
Chevron have also made notable investments in green technologies. But some critics
maintain that their approach is calculated and has more to do with the very
real possibility that U.S.
lawmakers will require mandatory greenhouse gas emission cuts.
The goal is
to motivate companies with the resources to diversify their energy portfolios.
Ultimately, the nation must be able to meet its future energy through an
amalgam of sources. While oil and natural gas will remain integral,
alternative fuels and energy conservation will have a place at the table.
If the goal
of corporate boards is to protect the interest of shareholders, then it
would be appropriate to ask those officers whether they should diversify
away from oil. It's a heated topic, with some saying that they are energy
companies that must get ahead of the trends and be prepared for the future.
Others, though, are saying that their strategies mirror current realities
and that petroleum will remain the dominant fuel source for transportation
well into the future.
Lofty Goals
ExxonMobil,
for example, has shelled out about $30 billion developing new oil and gas
resources since about 2003. Last year, it spent slightly more buying back
its shares, all to help increase the value of the company's outstanding
stock. Its board clearly states that fossil fuels provide the company more
bang for the buck. Its management, however, is investing in alternative
fuels that include a $600 million partnership to develop algae-based
bio-fuels.
While that
figure represents a small percentage of its overall capital budget,
champions of the alternative transportation fuel cause say that it is still
more than what the federal government devotes to algae research. Many
Democrats and environmental organizations counter that the ExxonMobil's
profits have been "absurd" and argue that some of its tax
benefits should be reallocated to developers of green energy.
Republicans
generally oppose such changes, saying that the demand for energy is rising
and that the country needs to do more to encourage oil and gas development.
Any tax hike, they add, would deter production, diminish supply and thereby
increase prices to consumers. Many Democrats point out that the oil
industry recently earned $123 billion in profits and it does not need
incentives to drill.
The
Democrats control both chambers of Congress as well as the White House. If
their leadership is able to unite its party, it can literally mandate a
paradigm shift -- one that that tries to minimize the nation's carbon
footprint by penalizing the fossil fuel sector.
They want
to build upon the current foundation. Clean tech industries are now making
a strong contribution to the American economy, providing 116,000 jobs and
$19 billion in investment in recent times. The U.S. wind industry, for
example, expanded by 45 percent in 2007 and contributed about 30 percent of
new power generating capacity last year.
"Instead
of giving oil executives another way to boost their record profits, I
believe we should put in place a windfall profits tax that will help to ease
the burden of higher energy costs on working families, and we should invest
in the affordable, renewable sources," President Obama said on the
campaign trial.
While those
comments were made at time when gas prices at the pump were at $4 a gallon
and he has since softened his approach, the president has nonetheless
stayed true to his theme: The nation must reduce both its dependence on
foreign oil as well as its current consumption levels, relying instead on
alternative sources of energy to power not just the transport sector but
also electric utilities.
It is a
lofty goal. But the oil companies are betting for now that things won't
change that much despite the party in power.
Return to Environmental Update
Return to Homepage
Roubidoux
True tales of the Huckleberry Finn type adventures of a boy who journeys from
delinquency in California to Southern culture in the Missouri Ozarks. Although told
through the eyes of a twelve year old who never grows old, much of the real life
adventure is emotionally timeless with appeal to all ages. Brutally honest at
times but never off colored.
A sample from Roubidoux may be read here.
The book may be ordered here.
Do you know that your body is naturally acidic which makes you susceptible to all manner of unhealthy conditions and illnesses? By making your body alkaline instead of acidic you mitigate these potential health problems. One way of doing this is to drink alkaline water. The above machine is called the "Athena" and makes tap water into pure, clean alkaline water. It's rather expensive, but it's the best in the world. Isn't your health worth it?
Click here to learn more and order it.
Want to live clean without exposing yourself or your family to hazardous chemicals? Miracle II
soap is all natural and contains no hazardous chemicals. You can clean anything with it, including your body. A capful of it in the water each time you bathe will guarantee you will never see another
scum ring in your tub, to say nothing of the infinitely more dramatic beneficial
effects attested to by a multitude of Miracle II users throughout the world. From the mundane to the sublime, Miracle II works!
|