State of the Cardinals
By Joe Mammy with Brian
Walton
Well, I guess the off season begins now. So, for those of us who aren't
all up on contracts, arbitration and the like where do we sit? I'm pretty sure
Matheny, Renteria, Morris, Kline and LaRussa/Jocketty are without a contract at this point, Woody has a club option and Marquis
is eligible for arbitration. Who else is up for grabs? I assume most (if not all) our bench staff is open. Let me
run through my scenario of what I'd like to see and then you can tell me if my numbers are anywhere near possible J
1) Morris is gone. Morris is so gone. Unless he's willing to re-sign for 5th
starter money (500k tops…)
Walton’s take: Morris passed on
a two-year, $15.5 million extension last off-season and would probably like a mulligan.
But, getting a second chance at that kind of money from the Cardinals is only slightly more likely to happen than Morris
accepting $500 thousand. There are 29 other clubs who would pay more than that. But, I get your point.
I
honestly believe at this juncture, it may be better for Matt to move on, anyway, contact due or not. I cannot believe there is anything more than La Russa and Duncan can say or do that hasn’t been said and
done dozens of times already. It ain’t working.
Perhaps the Cards and Red Sox should do a sign and trade deal with Derek Lowe, who also fits the bill of high-priced,
inconsistent impending free-agent disappointment.
2) Renteria is gone. Asking too much money—great guy but probably shopping around his '03 numbers to land a big contract.
Walton’s take: I am less convinced
that the situation is as hopeless as you imply. Still, it remains to be seen
if the two sides can truly come together. The rhetoric to-date both positively
and negatively has meant little. With no substantive inside information, I would
call this less than 50-50, but still possible.
Remember
that Nomar is out there, too, as is Orlando Cabrera. The list of teams who would pay $10 million per year for a shortstop is a pretty short one right now. Anaheim, the Cubs, Boston and who? I still
believe Cabrera will be asked back in Boston and Nomar would be good fit in Anaheim.
The Angels and the Cubs are teams that I fear most in the Edgar sweepstakes.
3) LaRussa/Jocketty—I'm a big TLR fan, but I'm not
sure what bringing him back will do. Art Howe is back on the market and might
be a cheaper option for a team that may have to make a youth movement soon. Although
2nd time is the charm for LaRussa teams in the series, right?—and now I read that he's planning to stay. Good, bad, whatya think?
Walton’s take: Like it or not, both
will be back and I think they deserve to be. I wish Tony wasn’t so tightly wound
because I suspect it was a factor in the Series, but he should get another chance to repeat.
Frankly, the adversity that the Cardinals had to face in 2004 was quite a bit less than some other teams. So, I will be watching to see how La Russa and the team respond when the inevitable trouble hits in 2005,
as that will be my indicator as to whether I am comfortable with Tony longer-term.
4) Hector Luna is not an everyday
player—no matter how much they'd like him to be, at least not yet. But, given
the way LaRussa uses him it's unlikely he's going to get the time to polish up in St Louis.
Tough call—especially since LaRussa loves low cost veterans over low-cost newbies.
Walton’s take: No, Luna is not yet
ready to be an everyday player. Look to him playing full-time in Memphis in 2005 to polish his game in a lower-pressure
environment.
5) Kline—gone if TLR stays—if
flipping off Tony didn't do it, pouting in the post season finished it off. It's
a shame, but might be the right time to do it given his injury problems of late.
Walton’s take: Overall, I am sorry
to see him go, but the emergence of Carmen Cali and the continued success of Ray King make Kline expendable.
6) Tavarez—real dark horse. Alienated management and fans alike, but still gave a gutsy performance. Still has time on his contract but might be more useful as trade bait to land another LaRussa veteran?
Walton’s take: I can’t see many
teams that would take Tavarez for $2.6 million even if Jocketty wanted to trade him.
He is probably staying right here. He is a valuable set-up man, but I
have other serious problems with the guy as I have stated previously.
7) Womack—another tough call. Great lead-off guy and proven veteran which could mean leadership and spark or three
months on the DL.
Walton’s take: I think Womack’s
pact with the devil may come due as he returns to his former self in 2005. No
offense to Womack, as his 2004 contributions were real. I just hope his inevitable
crash to earth occurs somewhere else. As a result, a bona-fide leadoff hitter
would have to come from somewhere. This is an area I would look for a trade. See shortstop discussion following.
8) Matheny—I'm ambivalent on
a lot of these moves, but I don't think there's any question that Matheny should/needs to come back. Platoon him more evenly with Molina, but he's been an unsung hero since day one. Great leader, one of the greatest defensive catchers ever and invaluable to a pitching staff which likely
won't be overwhelming next year.
Walton’s take: I agree. A lot will depend on the offers he gets elsewhere. If I had
a team with a good, young staff, I might be willing to overpay for Matheny. Since
the Cardinals probably want to underpay for him, this may not end up the way we prefer.
9) Marlon Anderson—most effective
pinch-hitter and still not very good. Might get invited back to Spring Training,
but I don't see lightning striking twice for him to make the roster.
Walton’s take: I can see Anderson getting invited back. I just wish I cared. It’s not Marlon’s fault he was put in
the outfield, but it was his fault he can’t hit. The bench could definitely use
some more pop.
10) Cal Eldred—should come back if the price
is right. Can get crucial outs but usually used to kill of innings in laughers. Streaky too. Great guy, but expendable.
Walton’s take: I think it is about
the end of the line for Cal as a Cardinal for the same basic reason as Kline.
He will expect more money than he is worth at this point. Keep a cheaper
Al Reyes, let Cal walk and save between ½ and ¾ of a million dollars.
I know ownership is talking Luna as potential shortstop of the future, but I'd like to see someone like Christian
Guzman of the Twins land here. Very good player, good numbers and with an infield
including Rolen and Pujols is only going to get better. Much cheaper than Renteria
and I think he'll do as well if not better than Edgar.
Walton’s take: Joe, did you run out of numbers at ten, or what? Anyway, Guzman would certainly be a less-expensive alternative at shortstop. I wish he was more consistent, but would be worth taking a look at if the situation
gets to that. If the team really believed Luna was only a year away being a starter,
getting a solid, older veteran like Omar Vizquel could make more sense than a much younger guy with upside like Guzman. Though they have historically been #2 hitters, either could lead off. That the spot in the order each has appeared in second most often in their respective careers.
Also, who's untouchable? Albert and Rolen, but is Edmonds?
Sanders is too cost effective to consider giving up with a year left unless there's a good trade, IMO. Walker—I like the guy, but even if we wanted to move him, not sure we could with his contract size.
Walton’s take: Edmonds becomes a ten-and-five man, meaning because of his time in the
majors and with one team, he cannot be traded without his consent. Prior to this,
he provided a list of six teams each year to which he could not veto a trade. At
his age, Sanders would have little market value, but should probably remain, anyway.
Considering they just acquired Walker and he did what was expected (except for the sac bunt), I can’t see why trading
him would be seriously considered.
Any of the potentials (Haren, Wainwright, Ankiel, or any of the others) off limits or likely to be offered? Any that shouldn't be on the table?
Walton’s take: I really doubt Ankiel is going anywhere. He is the dark horse who could become that dominant starter. They’ve
stayed with him this long; they’re not going to give up at the last minute. Of
course, that could change if he struggles in the spring, but I don’t expect that.
Some of the luster is coming off Wainwright as scouts were expecting to see continued improvement in his velocity,
which didn’t happen in 2004. No need for panic, but if the concerns are real,
the time to get peak value from him is now. I imagine Haren would only go as
part of a deal for that #1, dominant starter. I could see these two as part of
a Randy Johnson-type deal, for example. Not that I am advocating that; I was
simply using it as an example.
There's my list—critique, counter-propose or laugh off the page.
Walton’s take: No laughing here.
Thanks for the note, Joe. As you point out, it’s just the beginning of
what will be another very interesting off-season.