Born during WWII in Spokane, Washington. Been in the San Francisco
Bay Area most of my life (I LOVE
this place!) and now live in Palo Alto. Public school in San Mateo.
BA in Mathematics from
UC Berkeley. 5.5 years in the
USAF as a commissioned officer,
navigating B52s over Viet Nam. Married Donna in 1973. 4 years and bits
and pieces of
grad school at SFState,
Cal State
Hayward, Foothill College,
and San Jose State University. I
came to Stanford (to work) in
1981. We had a daughter, Lyra, in 1982.
Once a software developer,
then a teacher, now a substitute teacher, private math tutor and
handyman.
I have been a stock clerk, a busboy, a dishwasher, a shoe
salesman, a house cleaner, a data-entry person, a handyman, a
gardener, a lab rat, a telemarketer, a tool salesperson, a tutor, a
teacher, and a computer jockey. Jack-of-all-trades, master of none.
Professional
Interests
Students - a Haiku
We think we have learned
How best to teach children, yet
They are teaching us.
Current Title: (?) Maths
Tutor/teacher
I was a software developer/programmer/systems engineer for half of
my working life.
Then I changed careers. Look at my
rèsumè
For three years I studied Secondary Education at San
Jose State. I did student teaching at Gunn HS in Palo Alto. I
did another semester at Homestead High in Cupertino. I was riding my
bike to Gunn, but to Homestead I had to take the car. Bummer. After a
small mixup about one class and a quickie on-line course through
National University, I obtained my credential in September 2004.
18 January 2005 - I was offered a full-time teaching job at
Sequoia High School in Redwood City. In June, that brief stint at
Sequoia was over. It was both much harder, and more inspiring than I
imagined. I then taught summer school at Carlmont (same district).
Aug 2005 - I got a job the last day before school! Not enough prep
time to actually do first day of classes (and I had a previous
appointment) but the next day started teaching full time in Junior
High math in a school in east San Jose -
August
Boeger. It was rough. I loved the kids but they were a
challenge. My biggest complaint was the 15 hr days
I put in. And weekends. And because of the long commute, I had an
expensive accident in rush hour one day. I HATE commuting. Then on 10
February 06, my classes were given to a new
teacher. In June my tenure as a regular teacher ended. The entire next
year I worked as a substitute teacher.
In 2007 I started again as a
sub, still looking for a job - several interviews - then in November my
"little sister" Elaine told me about an opening in Sacramento, so I
applied, interviewed, and got the job at Hiram
Johnson HS. A disaster!
I ended up with an awful lot of kids who decided there
was nothing they could do to pass the class by the time I got to them,
and like all self-fulfilling prophecies...... I had 2 double classes (a
class and a tutoring - all on the same subject) and one single class,
all on Algebra 1. The single class was a failure - I had 2 pass from
more than 30 to start (but many dropped out - some actually transferred
out but most kept coming but did no math). And all year long kids would
be dropped and new ones added and one or two I NEVER saw in class! Half
the kids in my period
1-2 passed, a third of my 5-6 class. This last one was pure hell -
even the best kids didn't really want to do math. But that year
is
over. Despite the lousy experience at Hiram Johnson, I somewhat
enjoyed living with Elaine in Sacramento. But I enjoy more living in
Palo Alto.
I think I have decided to semi-retire. Teaching full time is too
much
like regularly shooting myself in the foot. And from the results of
2008, I no longer feel I am very good at this. Tutoring, sure.
Substituting, no problem. Now I just have to worry about money.
Personal Interests
.I square
dance and am learning to round dance (Waltz, currently).
I joyfully share my life with my wife, Donna, and my daughter, Lyra, (right)
We have a big black cat to keep life interesting. I enjoy
beer,
popcorn, chocolate, cookies of any kind, asparagus and just about
anything else (but now have to be careful of my blood sugar! By cutting
out almost ALL desserts, I lost 20 lbs!). I
collect stamps (if you see an interesting one, any
country, save it for me!). I listen to classical music, and rock and
newer stuff, too. I read Science Fiction and a lot of math &
science. I solve puzzles. I bicycle pretty much everywhere. In the spring I hunt wildflowers. I garden vegetables and flowers
and have taken a ton of gravel out of my yard in the process. I make
lousy puns.
Laws of life
(an on-going creation):
We are all in this together.
Nobody gets out alive
You can't expect others to give you what you won't give
them (Golden Rule)
Cosmic Justice? Sorry, that would be your
department! Thou art
god.
You better start laughing or you will have to start crying
Do your best - why settle for less?
You are in charge of your own happiness. Your mom was just
there until you learned this for yourself.
In most endeavors, you have only failed when you give up.
Murphy's Law (if anything Can go wrong, it Will!)
TANSTAAFL (There Aint No Such Thing As A Free Lunch)
90% of EVERYTHING is crap. That leaves enough good parts to
enjoy the day. Offer expires at midnight.
The Legislative Analyst's Office for the office of State Assemblywoman
Noreen Evans (D-Santa Rosa) broke down state income (taxes and fees)
and expendatures by county and discovered something really remarkable:
the counties which contribute the most (per capita) are not the ones
expending the most (per capita). That would not be too terribly odd
except that there is a clear correspondence between this imbalance and
political affiliation: MOST of the money comes FROM strongly Democratic
counties and is spent through entitlements of various kinds in strongly
REPUBLICAN counties.
For example, the number 1 per capita contributer is Marin
county (not surprising that the report comes from Santa Rosa) at $4793.
Its expendature of state funds is only $606 per capita. This makes
sense because Marin county is pretty wealthy - the people with money
want to live there. They pay a lot of taxes and don't need a lot of
State help. And it is heavily Democratic. This flies in the face of the
old stereotype of Democrats being working-class only and Republicans
being big business upper class.
Most of the high expense counties are in the State's Rural
North, such as Lake County, which spent $703 per capita for Medi-Cal,
while the State only took IN from Lake County a total of $879 per
capita. For comparison, San Mateo County, about 5 miles North of here,
spends only $257 per capita on Medi-Cal, a tiny part of the $4232 per
capita it sends to Sacramento.
Disclaimer: These are per capita comparisons. Most of
State funds are spent in the areas with the greatest population. But
most of the State's income comes from there, too. The per capita
comparison lets us look at how money is re-distributed throughout the
state.
Much of the anti-government rhetoric ("Cut Government
Spending!") comes from Rural Republican areas - the very areas getting
the most services for the least taxes. Hypocracy indeed.
Next time someone starts filibustering against State expendatures or
new taxes, ask just how much HIS/HER county really gets from the State,
and how much his/her supporters really pay for those services.
Follow-up Recently the Mercury News (San Jose) published Census Bureau data showing that much the same
situation occurs for the entire country: the most conservative counties also have the greatest dependence on
Federal earmarks. The solution seems obvious: if you think your area is getting too much federal help, elect
someone less likely to get that help - a progressive. Right. Like the conservatives really want to go there.
I invite your comments.
Please indicate the title,
so I can get your message past my spam
blocker.