DAILY DISSENT VOLUME I. Edition 9
Published by Anita Sands astrology@earthlink.net
for earlier copies, go to http://home.earthlink.net/~astrology/index2.htm
and scroll to bottom of page
^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
FRIENDLY FIRE - When the PENTAGON takes out liberal JOURNALISTS in the field!

The Pentagon has threatened to fire on the satellite uplink positions of
independent journalists in Iraq, according to veteran BBC war
correspondent, Kate Adie. In an interview with Irish radio, Ms. Adie
said that questioned about the consequences of such potentially fatal
actions, a senior Pentagon officer had said: "Who cares.. ..They've been
warned."

According to Ms. Adie, who twelve years ago covered the last Gulf War,
the Pentagon attitude is: "entirely hostile to the the free spread of
information."

"I am enormously pessimistic of the chance of decent on-the-spot
reporting, as the war occurs," she told Irish national broadcaster, Tom
McGurk on the RTE1 Radio "Sunday Show."

Ms. Adie made the startling revelations during a discussion of media
freedom issues in the likely upcoming war in Iraq. She also warned that
the Pentagon is vetting journalists according to their stance on the
war, and intends to take control of US journalists' satellite equipment
--in order to control access to the airwaves.

Another guest on the show, war author Phillip Knightley, reported that
the Pentagon has also threatened they: "may find it necessary to bomb
areas in which war correspondents are attempting to report from the
Iraqi side."

Transcript follows below.

Audio of this very frank discussion of the problems facing reporters in
Iraq. Guests: Kate Adie, BBC; Phillip Knightley, author of The First
Casualty, a history of war correspondents and propaganda; Chris Hedges,
award winning human rights journalist, and former Irish Times Editor
Connor Brady on the Sunday Show, RTE Radio1 9th March, 2003. Listen K.
Adie Realplayer 3 mins Listen full Gulf media freedom segment Audio 26
minutes[ Realplayer] Links valid until 16 March DOWNLOAD ENTIRE SHOW
HERE

Tom McGurk: " Now, Kate Adie, you join us from the BBC in London. Thank
you very much for going to all this trouble on a Sunday morning to come
and join us. I suppose you are watching with a mixture of emotions this
war beginning to happen, because you are not going to be covering it."

Kate Adie: " Oh I will be. And what actually appalls me is the
difference between twelve years ago and now. I've seen a complete
erosion of any kind of acknowledgment that reporters should be able to
report as they witness."

" The Americans... and I've been talking to the Pentagon ...take the
attitude which is entirely hostile to the free spread of information."

" I was told by a senior officer in the Pentagon, that if uplinks --that
is the television signals out of... Bhagdad, for example-- were detected
by any planes ...electronic media... mediums, of the military above
Bhagdad... they'd be fired down on. Even if they were journalists ..'
Who cares! ' said.. [inaudible] .."

Tom McGurk: "...Kate ...sorry Kate ..just to underline that. Sorry to
interrupt you. Just to explain for our listeners. Uplinks is where you
have your own satellite telephone method of distributing information."

Kate Adie: " The telephones and the television signals."

Tom McGurk: " And they would be fired on? "

Kate Adie: " Yes. They would be 'targeted down,'
said the officer."

Tom McGurk: " Extraordinary ! "

Kate Adie: " Shameless! "

" He said.. ' Well... they know this ... they've been warned.' "

" This is threatening freedom of information, before you even get to a
war."

"The second thing is there was a massive news blackout imposed."

"In the last Gulf war, where I was one of the pool correspondents with
the British Army. We effectively had very, very light touch when it came
to any kind of censorship."

" We were told that anything which was going to endanger troops lives
which we understood we shouldn't broadcast. But other than that, we were
relatively free."

" Unlike our American colleagues, who immediately left their pool, after
about 48 hours, having just had enough of it."

" And this time the Americans are: a) Asking journalists who go with
them, whether they are... have feelings against the war. And therefore
if you have views that are skeptical, then you are not to be
acceptable."

" Secondly, they are intending to take control of the Americans
technical equipment ...those uplinks and satellite phones I was talking
about. And control access to the airwaves."

" And then on top of everything else, there is now a blackout (which was
imposed, during the last war, at the beginning of the war), ...ordered
by one Mr. Dick Cheney, who is in charge of this."

" I am enormously pessimistic of the chance of decent on-the-spot
reporting, as the war occurs. You will get it later."

Think the GOV wouldn't do it to reporters? In VietNam, the CIA sent
in death squads to take out our G.I's, our PRISONERS in the bunkers
of the VIET CONG. When CBS reported on it, all hell broke out.

^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^

Letter from Jimmy Carter
March 9, 2003, NY Times
Just War as USUAL or a Just War? By Jimmy Carter

ATLANTA
Profound changes have been taking place in American foreign
policy, reversing consistent bipartisan commitments that for more than
two centuries have earned our nation greatness. These commitments have
been predicated on basic religious principles, respect for international
law, and alliances that resulted in wise decisions and mutual restraint.
Our apparent determination to launch a war against Iraq, without
international support, is a violation of these premises.

As a Christian and as a president who was severely provoked by
international crises, I became thoroughly familiar with the principles
of a just war, and it is clear that a substantially unilateral attack on
Iraq does not meet these standards. This is an almost universal
conviction of religious leaders, with the most notable exception of a
few spokesmen of the Southern Baptist Convention who are greatly
influenced by their commitment to Israel based on eschatological, or
final days, theology.

For a war to be just, it must meet several clearly defined criteria. The
war can be waged only as a last resort, with all nonviolent options
exhausted. In the case of Iraq, it is obvious that clear alternatives to
war exist. These options  previously proposed by our own leaders and
approved by the United Nations  were outlined again by the Security
Council on Friday. But now, with our own national security not directly
threatened and despite the overwhelming opposition of most people and
governments in the world, the United States seems determined to carry
out military and diplomatic action that is almost unprecedented in the
history of civilized nations. The first stage of our widely publicized
war plan is to launch 3,000 bombs and missiles on a relatively
defenseless Iraqi population within the first few hours of an invasion,
with the purpose of so damaging and demoralizing the people that they
will change their obnoxious leader, who will most likely be hidden and
safe during the bombardment.

The war's weapons must discriminate between combatants and
noncombatants. Extensive aerial bombardment, even with precise accuracy,
inevitably results in "collateral damage." Gen. Tommy R. Franks,
commander of American forces in the Persian Gulf, has expressed concern
about many of the military targets being near hospitals, schools,
mosques and private homes.

Its violence must be proportional to the injury we have suffered.
Despite Saddam Hussein's other serious crimes, American efforts to tie
Iraq to the 9/11 terrorist attacks have been unconvincing.

The attackers must have legitimate authority sanctioned by the society
they profess to represent. The unanimous vote of approval in the
Security Council to eliminate Iraq's weapons of mass destruction can
still be honored, but our announced goals are now to achieve regime
change and to establish a Pax Americana in the region, perhaps occupying
the ethnically divided country for as long as a decade. For these
objectives, we do not have international authority. Other members of the
Security Council have so far resisted the enormous economic and
political influence that is being exerted from Washington, and we are
faced with the possibility of either a failure to get the necessary
votes or else a veto from Russia, France and China. Although Turkey may
still be enticed into helping us by enormous financial rewards and
partial future control of the Kurds and oil in northern Iraq, its
democratic Parliament has at least added its voice to the worldwide
expressions of concern.

The peace it establishes must be a clear improvement over what exists.
Although there are visions of peace and democracy in Iraq, it is quite
possible that the aftermath of a military invasion will destabilize the
region and prompt terrorists to further jeopardize our security at home.
Also, by defying overwhelming world opposition, the United States will
undermine the United Nations as a viable institution for world peace.

What about America's world standing if we don't go to war after such a
great deployment of military forces in the region? The heartfelt
sympathy and friendship offered to America after the 9/11 attacks, even
from formerly antagonistic regimes, has been largely dissipated;
increasingly unilateral and domineering policies have brought
international trust in our country to its lowest level in memory.
American stature will surely decline further if we launch a war in clear
defiance of the United Nations. But to use the presence and threat of
our military power to force Iraq's compliance with all United Nations
resolutions -- with war as a final option -- will enhance our status as a
champion of peace and justice.

Jimmy Carter, the 39th president of the United States, is chairman of
the Carter Center in Atlanta and winner of the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize.

And here you can access the locations of thousands of vigils worldwide
this Sunday at 7PM at http://www.moveon.org/vigil/

^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
from the horse's mouth....Genocide is the Plan

http://www.stratiawire.com/article.asp?id=967

THE ATOMIC MEDIA: AN INTERVIEW WITH ELLIS MEDAVOY by Jon Rappaport

MARCH 6. Since I ran my stories on AIDS and the depopulation agenda, (i.e. Oligarchs used World Health Org to place AIDS virus in AFRICA to depopulate the continent, in a mass, forced vaccination program, ) my readers have expressed an interest in hearing more from Ellis Medavoy, a
retired propaganda operative who was my source for some of that material.

So here is an interview with Ellis on the subject of the media and how
information is distorted in a particular way to derail justice.

Q: You occasionally use the term “atomic media.” What do you mean by
that?

A: I’m talking about how stories are presented as if each one exists in a
vacuum by itself. As if each story is a sole atom floating in nothing.

Q: You mean stories aren’t connected to one another.

A: Right. Sometimes they are, but not to the degree where an entire
institution is seriously threatened.

Q: What do you mean, seriously threatened?

A: That the institution itself could go down, could actually cease to
exist. Most people don’t think about the fact that the overwhelming
number of modern institutions---the really big ones---never become
extinct. At worst they take a hit and are re-organized. But why shouldn’t
many of them just disappear in a storm of revelation? There are many
reasons why this doesn’t happen, but one is, the media present stories on
these institutions one at a time---how often do you really read a
compelling piece that sums up all the crimes of a major, major
institution? Almost never. You know, traditionally the press has taken
the lead on exposing these multiple crimes, and then you would sometimes
get major Congressional hearings in the aftermath. But what is the last
Congressional hearing that actually took a gigantic institution to task
in a serious way?

Q: Enron?

A: Enron will be reorganized so that new giants swallow up pieces of the
old giant. No, I would say that the Church hearings of the 1970s, on the
CIA, were the last major hearings that even tried---however
impotently---to really put the wood to a major institution.

Q: Can you give me an example of a press story that could be written
which would actually disturb people greatly, vis-à-vis a major
institution?

A: Okay---just very briefly---July 1, 1961, Saskatchewan, Canada. Huge
numbers of doctors went on strike. For 23 days. The overall mortality
rate among the population during that time made a steep decline. 1976,
Bogota, Colombia. Doctors went on strike for 52 days. The death rate
dropped 35 percent. Same year, 1976, a doctors’ strike in Los Angeles. 18
percent drop in mortality. 1973, Israel. A 30 day doctors’ strike.
Mortality rate dove by 50 percent. 2000, Israel. Another doctors’ strike.
Funeral homes reported big drops in business. Meir Adler, who runs the
Shamgar Funeral Parlour that buries a lot of Jerusalem residents, tells
the Jerusalem Post, “There definitely is a connection between the
doctors’ sanctions [strike] and fewer deaths. We saw the same thing in
1983 when the Israel Medical Association applied sanctions [work
stoppage] for four and a half months.” Now, the so-called experts try to
explain this away with various absurd arguments. But they can’t.

Q: So---

A: So I’m saying, if media wanted to take these and other similar stories
and put them together and run a whole series on this, and if the wire
services joined in, if there was enough coverage and enough quoted
outcry, you would BEGIN to see the tip of the iceberg crack, just a
little. It would be a start. If there were a really good anti-medical PR
firm---which there isn’t, and why the hell NOT?---that firm could pick up
this little ball and run with it. See? Find a doctor somewhere who works
at a prestigious university---and you can find them if you look---and get
a lead quote from him---hell, arrange a whole conference just so he can
say the words, “When doctors don’t work, the death rate goes way down.”
Then you come in behind that with these examples, and you’ve got a
toenail in the door. But the major media won’t give that to you on their
own. You have to fight for it.

Q: You could do the same thing with suppressed cancer treatments.

A: Sure. The book you keep touting, Politics in Healing, by Dan Haley, a
former elected politician in New York---that’s a fantastic piece of work.
You’ve got ten or so legitimate cancer treatments described in there that
have been buried by the medical cartel. You could go to little towns and
find people who are still alive because they got one of those treatments.
Lead with that, and come in behind it with another tale that involved a
cure from another suppressed modality---the possibilities are endless. Go
up against the media and get stories you want planted in the press. I’m
not saying this would easy---but you’d be surprised at the long-term
effect.

Q: Vaccines.

A: Right. Gannett did a whole series on vaccines some years ago. Very
good. But no more. Now all you get is the atomic thing. Stories here and
there, unconnected. Imagine what you could really do. Tie in all the
vaccines together.

Q: You once told me you did propaganda work on behalf of vaccines in the
Third World.

A: S**t, there were all sorts of PR people involved. The “miracle of the
smallpox vaccine campaign in Africa.” What a load. They never tracked the
vaccine recipients long-term to see what really happened to them. They
asserted that smallpox itself was the only real side-effect when the
vaccine went wrong. The truth is, the vaccine can cause all sorts of very
bad effects. But that was ignored. I could tell you things. And they
know! They know that when you give a vaccine like smallpox to people
whose immune systems are already suppressed, you get all sorts of
horrible effects, and some of those take awhile to become obvious.

Q: So---

A: Listen, let me point out one thing I think you missed about a London
Times piece you often refer to.

Q: May 11, 1987?

A: Yeah, front page. The article that said there was a correlation
between numbers of smallpox vaccinations given in Third World countries
and ensuing AIDS cases. They did get their statistics screwed up in that
piece, but---

Q: And the AP science desk in New York refused to even send that story
out on the wire to US press outlets.

A: I know, I know. But there were several reasons why AP buried it. And
one of those reasons was, the article had a quote in it from Robert
Gallo.

Q: I remember.

A: Yeah, but maybe you overlooked it as a major reason WHY AP buried the
story. Gallo said that he had warned before about giving vaccines like
smallpox to populations that were already extremely immune suppressed,
because the effects could be devastating. Try to find Gallo saying that
to an American newspaper---try to find it. I can’t. That little gem was
covered over with a ton of silence.

Q: Yes, I see what you’re saying.

A: People have to realize that when one of these monster vaccine
campaigns is launched, there are PR people---ALWAYS---working behind the
scenes to make sure all the press reports are sticking to the party line.
They don’t just leave these things up to chance.

Q: But sometimes the PR people fail.

A: It happens, like in the case of the anthrax scare in the US. The PR
propaganda people were doing a very bad job---they were hindered by the
high-profile nature of the scare. Too many doctors just started talking
to the press, and so you got a variety of opinion as to how serious or
un-serious it all was and who was behind it. And the Internet weighed in
and influenced the story too.

Q: But normally---

A: You’ve got propaganda people influencing the press to print THIS or
not print THAT. The World Health Organization, which is in charge of some
of the PR for the vaccine campaigns---their in-house
propagandists---they’re mostly morons. I wouldn’t hire them to publicize
a lawn party. They are good at one thing only: saying it’s all fine,
everything is going well. And they’re also pretty good at stalling. “The
report will be out next year.” Running the PR on these vaccine campaigns,
you do, in fact, see---if you look---outside PR people who are working
their press contacts and working their “reliable sources’ who in turn
talk to reporters and feed them a better brand of sophisticated baloney.

Q: And the upshot is, lots of people in the Third World are getting
hammered by vaccines and very few people know about it.

A: Hammered is the right word.

Q: Is this whole aspect of the medical cartel---the huge vaccine
campaigns in the Third World---

A: In a sense, it’s basically a continuation of Rockefeller
Medicine---you know, in the early days, Rockefeller wanted to develop
medicines for people in the Third World SO THEY COULD WORK WITHOUT DYING.
So they could continue to perform labor on big corporate projects. It had
nothing to do with basic health. It had to do with propping up the
indigenous labor force.

Q: “We have to find a way to enable the slaves to keep up the long
hours.”

A: You’ve got it.

Q: But if these vaccine campaigns really disable and maim and kill so
many people in the long run, then the “Rockefeller paradigm” is, in its
own terms, a failure. It doesn’t achieve their desired goal.

A: Two things to say about that. There are overwhelming numbers of
doctors and researchers who believe that vaccines are effective. But the
more important thing to say is, Rockefeller people developed another
agenda over time, an agenda which is taking precedence.

Q: Depopulation.

A: Yes.

Q: Then how will giant corporations in the future obtain the necessary
slave labor to do work in the Third World?

A: I could say a lot about that, but the basic answer is automation. They
want depopulated virgin land and virgin resources, first and foremost.
They’re confident they can figure out how to work the land with machines
in the next fifty years. And, as we’ve discussed before, they intend to
RE-SEED those depopulated areas with people [“support staff”] from
America and other industrialized nations---people who are indoctrinated
to believe in the vision of a new world. A global economy ENTIRELY run by
the biggest corporations.

Q: And ultimately, these corporations will have to accommodate themselves
to a limited consumer base, globally speaking, in the wake of increasing
depopulation.

A: Yes. But think of the trade-off. Limited consumer base in return for
being COMPLETE AND UTTER KINGS of the world economy. Kings who are backed
up by a global army. It’s really what we have now, except if their vision
comes true, the degree of control will be much greater. Absolute.

Q: And HIV, the virus that doesn't cause anything, figures into this as?

A: A smokescreen to conceal depopulation launched by other means.

JON RAPPOPORT a noble researcher on AIDs and conspiracy theory,
whoops, Gore Vidal says don't use that term as it means you believe in UFOS!
So let's call it political intrigue, palace skivvy....

Jon holds forth at http://www.stratiawire.com
a provocative website for your kids to visit.

^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
Addiction, Brain Damage and the President

"Dry Drunk" Syndrome and George W. Bush

by KATHERINE van WORMER

Ordinarily I would not use this term. But when I came across the article
"Dry Drunk" - - Is Bush Making a Cry for Help? in American Politics
Journal by Alan Bisbort, I was ready to concede, in the case of George
W. Bush, the phrase may be quite apt.

Dry drunk is a slang term used by members and supporters of Alcoholics
Anonymous and substance abuse counselors to describe the recovering
alcoholic who is no longer drinking, one who is dry, but whose thinking
is clouded. Such an individual is said to be dry but not truly sober.
Such an individual tends to go to extremes.

It was when I started noticing the extreme language that colored
President Bush's speeches that I began to wonder. First there were the
terms--"crusade" and "infinite justice" that were later withdrawn. Next
came "evil doers," "axis of evil," and "regime change", terms that have
almost become clichés in the mass media. Something about the polarized
thinking and the obsessive repetition reminded me of many of the
recovering alcoholics/addicts I had treated. (A point worth noting is
that because of the connection between addiction and "stinking
thinking," relapse prevention usually consists of work in the cognitive
area). Having worked with recovering alcoholics for years, I flinched at
the single-mindedness and ego- and ethnocentricity in the President's
speeches. (My husband likened his phraseology to the gardener character
played by Peter Sellers in the movie, Being There). Since words are the
tools, the representations, of thought, I wondered what Bush's choice of
words said about where he was coming from. Or where we would be going.

First, in this essay, we will look at the characteristics of the
so-called "dry drunk;" then we will see if they apply to this
individual, our president; and then we will review his drinking history
for the record.

What is the dry drunk syndrome? "Dry drunk" traits consist of:

Exaggerated self-importance and pomposity
Grandiose behavior
A rigid, judgmental outlook
Impatience
Childish behavior
Irresponsible behavior
Irrational rationalization
Projection
Overreaction

Clearly, George W. Bush has all these traits except exaggerated self
importance. He may be pompous, especially with regard to international
dealings, but his actual importance hardly can be exaggerated. His
power, in fact, is such that if he collapses into paranoia, a large part
of the world will collapse with him. Unfortunately, there are some
indications of paranoia in statements such as the following: "We must be
prepared to stop rogue states and their terrorist clients before they
are able to threaten or use weapons of mass destruction against the
United States and our allies and friends." The trait of projection is
evidenced here as well, projection of the fact that we are ready to
attack onto another nation which may not be so inclined.

Bush's rigid, judgmental outlook comes across in virtually all his
speeches. To fight evil, Bush is ready to take on the world, in almost a
Biblical sense. Consider his statement with reference to Israel: "Look
my job isn't to try to nuance. I think moral clarity is important...
this is evil versus good."

Bush's tendency to dichotomize reality is not on the Internet list
above, but it should be, as this tendency to polarize is symptomatic of
the classic addictive thinking pattern. I describe this thinking
distortion in Addiction Treatment: A Strengths Perspective as either/or
reasoning--"either you are with us or against us." Oddly, Bush used
those very words in his dealings with other nations. All-or-nothing
thinking is a related mode of thinking commonly found in newly
recovering alcoholics/addicts. Such a worldview traps people in a
pattern of destructive behavior.

Obsessive thought patterns are also pronounced in persons prone to
addiction. There are organic reasons for this due to brain chemistry
irregularities; messages in one part of the brain become stuck there.
This leads to maddening repetition of thoughts. President Bush seems
unduly focused on getting revenge on Saddam Hussein ("he tried to kill
my Dad")leading the country and the world into war, accordingly.

Grandiosity enters the picture as well. What Bush is proposing to
Congress is not the right to attack on one country but a total shift in
military policy: America would now have the right to take military
action before the adversary even has the capacity to attack. This is in
violation, of course,of international law as well as national precedent.
How to explain

this grandiose request? Jane Bryant Quinn provides the most commonly
offered explanation in a recent Newsweek editorial, "Iraq: It's the Oil,
Stupid." Many other opponents of the Bush doctrine similarly seek a
rational motive behind the obsession over first, the war on terror and
now, Iraq. I believe the explanation goes deeper than oil, that Bush's
logic is being given too much credit; I believe his obsession is far
more visceral.

On this very day, a peace protestor in Portland held up the sign, "Drunk
on Power." This, I believe, is closer to the truth. The drive for power
can be an unquenchable thirst, addictive in itself. Senator William
Fulbright, in his popular bestseller of the 1960s, The Arrogance of
Power, masterfully described the essence of power-hungry politics as the
pursuit of power; this he conceived as an end in itself. "The causes and
consequences of war may have more to do with pathology than with
politics," he wrote, "more to do with irrational pressures of pride and
pain than with rational calculation of advantage and profit."

Another "dry drunk" trait is impatience. Bush is far from a patient man:
"If we wait for threats to fully materialize," he said in a speech he
gave at West Point, "we will have waited too long." Significantly, Bush
only waited for the United Nations and for Congress to take up the
matter of Iraq's disarmament with extreme reluctance.

Alan Bisbort argues that Bush possesses the characteristics of the "dry
drunk" in terms of: his incoherence while speaking away from the
script;his irritability with anyone (for example, Germany's Schröder)
who dares disagree with him; and his dangerous obsessing about only one
thing (Iraq)to the exclusion of all other things.

In short, George W. Bush seems to possess the traits characteristic of
addictive persons who still have the thought patterns that accompany
substance abuse. If we consult the latest scientific findings, we will
discover that scientists can now observe changes that occur in the brain
as a result of heavy alcohol and other drug abuse. Some of these changes
may be permanent.. Except in extreme cases, however, these cognitive
impairments would not be obvious to most observers.

To reach any conclusions we need of course to know Bush's personal
history relevant to drinking/drug use. To this end I consulted several
biographies. Yes, there was much drunkenness, years of binge drinking
starting in college, at least one conviction for DUI in 1976 in Maine,
and one arrest before that for a drunken episode involving theft of a
Christmas wreath. According to J.D. Hatfield's book, Fortunate Son, Bush
later explained: "[A]lcohol began to compete with my energies....I'd
lose focus." Although he once said he couldn't remember a day he hadn't
had a drink, he added that he didn't believe he was "clinically
alcoholic." Even his father, who had known for years that his son had a
serious drinking problem, publicly proclaimed: "He was never an
alcoholic. It's just he knows he can't hold his liquor."

Bush drank heavily for over 20 years until he made the decision to
abstain at age 40. About this time he became a "born again Christian,"
going as usual from one extreme to the other. During an Oprah interview,
Bush acknowledged that his wife had told him he needed to think about
what he was doing. When asked in another interview about his reported
drug use, he answered honestly, "I'm not going to talk about what I did
20 to 30 years ago."

That there might be a tendency toward addiction in Bush's family is
indicated in the recent arrests or criticism of his daughters for
underage drinking and his niece for cocaine possession. Bush, of course,
deserves credit for his realization that he can't drink moderately, and
his decision today to abstain. The fact that he doesn't drink
moderately, may be suggestive of an inability to handle alcohol. In any
case, Bush has clearly gotten his life in order and is in good physical
condition, careful to exercise and rest when he needs to do so. The fact
that some residual effects from his earlier substance abuse, however
slight, might cloud the U.S. President's thinking and judgment is
frightening, however, in the context of the current global crisis.

One final consideration that might come into play in the foreign policy
realm relates to Bush's history relevant to his father. The Bush
biography reveals the story of a boy named for his father, sent to the
exclusive private school in the East where his father's reputation as
star athlete and later war hero were still remembered. The younger
George's achievements were dwarfed in the school's memory of his father.
Athletically he could not achieve his father's laurels, being smaller
and perhaps less strong. His drinking bouts and lack of intellectual
gifts held him back as well. He was popular and well liked, however. His
military record was mediocre as compared to his father's as well. Bush
entered the Texas National Guard.What he did there remains largely a
mystery. There are reports of a lot of barhopping during this period. It
would be only natural that Bush would want to prove himself today, that
he would feel somewhat uncomfortable following, as before, in his
father's footsteps. I mention these things because when you follow his
speeches, Bush seems bent on a personal crusade. One motive is to avenge
his father. Another seems to be to prove himself to his father. In fact,
Bush seems to be trying somehow to achieve what his father failed to do
- - to finish the job of the Gulf War, to get the "evildoer" Saddam.

To summarize, George W. Bush manifests all the classic patterns of what
alcoholics in recovery call "the dry drunk." His behavior is consistent
with barely noticeable but meaningful brain damage brought on by years
of heavy drinking and possible cocaine use. All the classic patterns of
addictive thinking that are spelled out in my book are here: the
tendency to go to extremes (leading America into a massive 100 billion
dollar strike-first war); a "kill or be killed mentality;" the tunnel
vision; "I" as opposed to "we" thinking; the black and white polarized
thought processes (good versus evil, all or nothing thinking); His drive
to finish his father's battles is of no small significance,
psychologically.

If the public (and politicians) could only see what Fulbright noted as
the pathology in the politics. One day, sadly, they will.

^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
 

TRACKING THE ELUSIVE TRUTH
WEB SOURCE ARTICLES edited by Anita Sands Hernandez astrology@earthlink.net

If you were a mystery writer, say, an Agatha Christie chess brain, and were confronted with a pair of corpses, two very tall, well loved, glamorous, American TWINS) , you would review the clues with avidity wouldn't you?

If you read every article in cyberspace, you would see, as researchers do, that U.S. spooks knew the two, beautiful twins were a.) scheduled to be offed, and b.) their death by fire would get you so crazy-flag-waving that they could put a long, long war before you and you'd bite down on it, hook and all.

The USA, CIA, NSC, Joint Chiefs, George Senior, and Dick Cheney, KNEW the WTC attack was FINALLY, about to happen. You'll see it if you hold the following clues in mind all at once:

1) ECHELON spies gave U.S authorities a 3 month warning of attacks. A German paper reported U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies received warning signals at least three months ago that terrorists were planning to hijack commercial aircraft to use as weapons to attack important symbols of American culture, according to a story in Germany's daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung http://wwwnewsbytes.com

2) The U.S. already in JULY 2001, had planned to attack the Taliban before the WTC/Pentagon attacks: a former Pakistani diplomat has told the BBC that the U.S.A. was planning military action against Osama and the Taliban even before last week’s attacks. Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani foreign secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October. (BBC news 9-18-01)

EVIDENCE THAT The USA already planned and attack on the Taliban.
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1550000/1550366.stm

This former Paki diplomat told the BBC that the U.S was planning military action against Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban even before last week’s attacks. Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani foreign secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October.

Mr Naik said U.S. officials told him of the plan at a U.N. sponsored international, contact group on Afghanistan which took place in Berlin. He told the BBC that at the meeting the us representatives told him that unless Bin Laden was handed over swiftly, America would take military action to kill or capture both Bin Laden and the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar.

The wider objective, according to Mr Naik, who is MIND YOU RETIRED and a PAKI, would be to topple the Taliban regime and install a transitional government of moderate (read manageable by US Oil men) Afghans in its place - possibly under the leadership of the former Afghan King Zahir Shah.

Mr Naik was told that Washington would launch its operation from bases in Tajikistan, (implying full Ruski cooperation) where American advisers were already in place. He was told that Uzbekistanwould also participate in the operation and that 17,000 Russian troops were on standby to AID IN THIS SEIZURE. (!) (At this point your AGATHA CHRISTIE CUI BONUM machinery starts clicking and you realize that RUSSIA and USA had imperialist aims related to that sand pit, i.e. it was to be pipeline for OIL biz between the new Capitalistniks in the Aparatchik Formerly known as Russia and the combined Bush/Houston/Global Marine, Sta Fe Internat'l cum Kuwait forces, i.e. their brand new corporation, only weeks old, merged September 4th, 2001.)

Naik had been told by his contacts that if the military action went ahead it would take place before the snows started falling in Afghanistan, by the middle of October at the latest. He said that he was in no doubt that after the world trade center bombings this pre-existing us plan had been built upon and would be implemented within two or three weeks and he said it was doubtful that Washington would drop its plan even if Bin Laden were to be surrendered immediately by the Taliban.

3.) Russia knew in advance...(obviously, see above) proven by fact IT encouraged citizens to cash out dollars: Russian press accounts and other activities by the russian government this summer indicate that the russians knew in advance that something would happen to america, including a "financial attack" against the u.s. during the past three months, russian media and officials have encouraged citizens to cash out of u.s. dollars pending an economic collapse there after an "attack." http://www/newsmax.com 9-17-01

4) The FBI tracked a PILOT TERRORIST (currently in custody) 2 weeks before attacks: "two weeks before the terrorist attacks in new york city and Washington, D.C., FBI agents were at a flight school in Oklahoma asking questions about a man now suspected of having a link to those attacks", according to CNN.

"The fact that FBI agents were at the airman flight school in Norman, Oklahoma, two weeks before any attacks would seem to contradict the agency’s assertion that it was not aware of any connection between aviation schools and suspected terrorists. FBI director Robert Mueller has stated publicly, "there were no warning signs that I’m aware of that would indicate this type of operation in the country," (http://cnn.com 9-18-01) somebody is lying!

5) USA pulled plug on 500 Arab/Muslim websites the day before jetliner attacks: five hundred websites - many of them with an arab or muslim connection - crashed when an anti-terrorism task force raided infocom corporation in texas. The 80-strong task force that descended upon the company included FBI agents, secret service agents, diplomatic security agents, tax inspectors, immigration officials, customs officials, department of commerce officials and computer experts. (Brian Whitaker 9-12-01)

6) 6 YEARS AGO, U.S. was warned in 1995 of plot to hijack planes, attack buildings: the FBI was warned of a terrorist plot to hijack commercial planes and slam them into the Pentagon, the CIA headquarters and other buildings, Philippine investigators told CNN just a few days ago. The plan was termed ''Project Bojinka.' (manila, philippines cnn 9-18-01)

7) U.S government had prior knowledge of OSAMA CELLS.  As ex CIA chief Stansfield Turner admitted, Oct 3rd, on CNN cable, US/ FBI had prior knowledge of 4 to 6 Bin Laden cells in the USA. That means the cells were completely bugged. Every phone line, every cell phone, every email. Turner said they couldn't move in and arrest them as a.) they'd done nothing illegal, and b.) each man was here LEGALLY. Which brings us to the fact:

8.) INS sold citizenship to terrorists for 6 thousand dollars a piece, as an 'under the table' bribe. There was interest in having these Bin Laden cells 'peopled' or 'filled out, as here inside USA, it was easy to watch and eavesdrop on them. An INS career officer, out of the ORLANDO FLorida INS office, caught and ratted out her bosses for selling citizenship to terrorists. When her bosses abused her, she sued the INS/ USA as a whistleblower and she won in court, a large cash settlement. The INS is currently appealing that decision. She Filed with aid of lawyer Donald Apignani in Florida. During her lawsuit, the INS officer sent all her evidence to John Ashcroft, head man at Dept of Justice, Atty Gen for USA. He did not answer her but sent the whole package back to her bosses. He did not want to know about it. The outraged INS officer woman is suing again in California, and while file any day, now.  But let's go back to NUMBER 7, U.S had PRIOR KNOWLEDGE

7.) CONTINUED -FOREIGN SPIES TOLD American CIA that the TERRORIST ATTACK WAS COMING THAT WEEK!  That the Sept 11th birthday of ISRAEL might be the day. (72 years ago) Among the foreign intelligence agencies who penetrated the plots were French DEUXIEME BUREAU  and ISRAEL'S MOSSAD  units of both often working with one another. Foreign intelligence sources confirm the validity of this story and they state that they informed the U.S. Secret police who absolutely failed, neglected, and outright refused to take action as to known prior specifics of which the top-level of the CIA were informed in advance.  http://www.skolnicksreport.com 9-13-01)

8.) THERE WAS A deliberate leak from a double agent in the White House. Terrorists had ultra secret codes day they attacked WTC and said as much. That they had the secret phones at White House, knew where POTUS was, Air Force One, all reported on http://worldnetdaily.com as well as in all media, Sept 22nd, 2001.

9) DEAD GIVEAWAY in unusual and SUSPICIOUS market activity reported before the attacks: "Chicago traders on Wednesday cited unusual activity in airline options up to a month before 911 emergency and German bankers reported brisk activity in Reinsurer Munich adding to speculation that those behind the attacks tried to profit from their acts. (Reuters 9-20-01) How come everyone  knew this was going to happen? Why would the USA. refuse to investigate when told, unless it was their own plan all along? FDR knew of Japan’s coming attack on Pearl Harbor. It certainly appears that the USA/ NWO/ CIA /NSC NSA  Secret White house elite who govern US backed by OLIGARCHS, BANKERS, knew in advance that a great catastrophe was about to occur on American soil and did absolutely nothing in order to prevent it.

What could have been done? Plenty. For starters, weapon-seeking X-ray security at all airports could have been beefed up. Air bases could have been put on alert. Planes should have been airborne upon the first indication of a hijacking. as it was, these hijacked planes were in the air for as much as a 30 minutes or more, after being hijacked and diverted, and yet totally unchallenged by military aircraft. At best, this was totally inept; and at worst, stinks of collusion.

There are many, many unanswered questions concerning the collapse of the towers. For example, why did the towers collapse? many engineers have stated that they were built to withstand an aircraft hit, and also to endure temperatures of 2,000 degrees. in addition, why did the south tower fall first, considering that it was hit by the second aircraft? CBC news replayed an ABC interview with two American heroes that rescued a handicapped person in the north tower. they said that while leaving the tower, they heard an explosion, turned around and saw the tower collapsing, and then ran for their lives. The question is: what explosion? the first tower was hit an hour and 45 minutes before this explosion, therefore, it could not have been from the jet fuel.

Another quote from the same article previously mentioned: why did the towers implode instead of explode? The towers came down as gracefully as a fountain of water. "too methodical to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures" said Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. "My opinion is that after the airplanes hit the world trade center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse," romero said. romero is a former director of the energetic materials research and testing center at tech, which studies explosive materials and the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and other structures. The towers imploded! they did not explode! a fuel fire causes an explosion, not an implosion. explosions explode out. implosions, implode in! implosions can only occur with immense planning by a highly skilled group of craftsmen educated in the unique skill of demolishing buildings by strategically placing explosive devices within the building. this requires many experts, much time and significant access to the building beforehand. the skill of implosion of buildings was developed primarily to demolish buildings in areas of high building density, so the destruction of the structure will not cause damage to the surrounding buildings. in addition, the towers came down long after the planes struck.

It is ludicrous to suggest that fuel dumping from the airplanes caused a fire hot enough to melt the inner structure first of all, who can prove the planes dumped all of their fuel into the core of the building? second, why did the fuel take so long to catch fire? third, fuel-fires cause explosions, not implosions! fourth, the structure was built to withstand temperatures of 2000 degrees fahrenheit, according to the architect and designer of the building, a man who is now deceased, but who preserved this nugget of information in an interview he recorded in 1998. Hyman Brown, a university of colorado civil engineering professor and the world trade center’s construction manager, watched in confusion as the towers came down. "it was over-designed to withstand almost anything including hurricanes, high winds, bombings and an airplane hitting it," he said. (Scripps Howard news service 9-11,01 and 9-12-01)So, why was it necessary to implode the whole structure? to eliminate evidence, just as was done to the Murrah building in Oklahoma City, before the forensic specialists could get in to examine the evidence. Just like the branch davidian compound at Waco was bulldozed by the government before any evidence could be examined. And the expert hired to look at 'flashes' caught on video who told his friends that flashes proved FBI shot every child that tried to get out…. that man was himself killed, the day before he was to testify to Congress.

Conclusion: this was a highly skilled endeavor by a large group of well-trained people with access to the buildings,  the airplanes and the explosives. they would have had to blend into the population and not look suspicious. and the bldgs in question had, a few weeks earlier, been sold  BY GOV to Mr. Silverstein.   NYC previously owned them (read Chase Manhattan Bank, and Citibank and those two together ARE the IMF..) Poor Mr Silverstein was 3.2 billion short and STEPFATHER BANK was out from under. Look on the Bright Side Mr. Silverstein. Not many renters get a chance to rebuild on the spot with the IMF financing them. Demolition was cheap! a few sticks of dynamite here, there. You still have a hundred year lease....

The real question is when it comes to downing two skyscrapers, who would have these qualifications? certainly not a group of Arab "terrorists" who bungled the l993 bombing and got caught. Who gained  from these attacks? Not terrorists, not Al-Qaeda.  It was the plantary oligarchs that let the terrorists have 'count that little coup', indulged them their one ugly, 15 minutes of fame as they needed AMERICANS TO START FOAMING FOR WAR.

Now the Middle East has  the wrath of the American eagle descending upon them. What Stone age sand flea in his right mind would want that?

Houston had to do it. They were essentially drillers without fields.  Pity the poor oligarchs, a plantary economy in deep recession. We weren't buying their stuff (snuffle, sniff) Oligarchs with nowhere to invest. That's how recessions start. When the POOR don't open their wallet, then the rich can't either.

Instead of concentrating on the terrorists, take a good look at what was transpiring in the USA and what can be extrapolated from it. They were like Godzillas feasting on our productivity. They took away our factories and salaries and still hoped we'd buy cars. We couldn't. What can they do with a trillion Fords that break down at l00,000 miles and are overpriced when Koreans can make a car that works? SELL US A WAR is what!

PART II. What else has happened since the attacks?

1) the population has been in one moment, prepared psychologically and economically, for a long term war where the number of U.S.. casualties will be high (Washington Post online September 21, 2001).

2) Bush created a new office of "homeland security"  (read SS, ) supposedly to protect Americans from attack. The job would involve coordination of government-wide domestic security efforts, including meshing domestic FBI, and foreign CIA intelligence, working alongside US. military, emergency officials and state and local governments.  Wanna bet that this new, patriotic  homeland defense position will probably not need senate confirmation, which other cabinet jobs require, nor legislation to create" white house officials said. so there will be no investigation, oversight nor accountability for this group's actions. An abrogation of our Constitution. (Reuters - Washington 9-21-01)

3) U.S. orders 40 million doses of smallpox vaccine for $343 million in preparation for a possible bioterrorism assault. The contract has been given to a small, cambridge-based firm Acambis, a British biotechnology company who reported a net loss of $8 million in the six months prior to June 30, unchanged from last year. (how convenient to get this huge order! It would be interesting to find the crony-ism involved, here.) (Reuters news, London 9-20-01) And the media is blaring everywhere about anthrax, small box, Saran gas, preparing the population to expect bio-terrorism.

4) America and Britain are co-producing secret plans to launch a ten year "war on terrorism" - Operation Noble Eagle - involving a completely new military and diplomatic strategy to eliminate terrorist networks and cells around the world." (The Times -London 9-20-01).

5) The American Senate already OKAYED the FBI  spying on the internet: fbi agents  soon will be able to spy on internet users legally without a court order. Two days after the terrorist attack, the senate approved the "combating terrorism act of 2001" which enhances police wiretap powers and permits monitoring in more situations. the fbi’s surveillance system is called carnivore. (Lycos network 9-20-01)

6) The U.S. plans to overthrow taliban and put Afghanistan under United Nations control, according to The Manchester Guardian - London (9-21-01) note: Yugoslavia is already under U.N. control.

7) A global surveillance system known as echelon exists and has the ability to eavesdrop on telephone calls, faxes and e-mail messages. Face-id technology gains new support. "State lawmakers who were planning to sponsor legislation restricting its use now say they are reassessing their plans." (Denver Post Capitol Bureau, 9-20-01)

9) "Experts see a high-security america of surveillance & seizures": new york: security experts in the united states are describing a new kind of country that could emerge, where electronic identification might become the norm, immigrants might be tracked far more closely and the airspace over cities like new york and washington might be off-limits to all civilian aircraft." (the  nternational herald tribune 9-19-01) more surveillance of u.s. citizens.

10) "Lawmakers see need to loosen rules on CIA"  Congressional leaders, who oversee the nation’s intelligence system (yeah right!) have concluded that america’s spy agencies should be allowed to combat terrorism with more aggressive tactics, including the hiring of unsavory foreign agents, including  revived discussion of reversing the us 25 year ban on using covert agents to assassinate foreigners. R. James Woolsey, the former director of the CIA said that "Washington has absolutely undergone a change in thinking this week." (New York Times, 9-16-01) So what we're getting for our intelligence nickle is a dime's worth of surveillance of u.s.citizens!

11) NATO announces a third world war is almost upon us. A Pentagon spokesman hinted towards potential targets being
Libya, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, north korea, Syria and others. (NATO secretary-general lord Robertson)

12) California congresswoman, Mary Bono, R-Palm Springs warned that the country should prepare for a fight against international terrorists that will likely include personal sacrifice, the use of ground troops overseas and the risk of  retaliation against civilians by the enemy. she alsopredicts intense scrutiny of airline passengers, a national system of fingerprinting and identification cards and the spectre of chemical and biological attacks on the u.s. (the Desert Sun 9-18-01)

13) An enemy is needed to justify a $344 billion war budget, when the federal government currently spends only $42 billion on education, $26 billion on affordable housing and bizarrely low, $1 billion on school construction.

14) President Bush sent his anti-terrorism bill to Congress one week after the WTC/Pentagon attack, launching an emotional debate that will force u.s. politicians to choose between continued freedom for americans or greater security. (Lycos network 9-20-01) does anybody know how long it takes to write one of these bills? it takes months! they are hundreds of pages long. this one was obviously written before the attack! how convenient! wake up America!

15) "President Bush focused his energy on building a global alliance for a fight against terrorism..." (MSNBC 9-18-01) here comes the new world order! 1984!

16) Fast-moving house bill restricts liberties - much of it unrelated to terrorism! congress is being asked to rush to pass emergency anti-terrorist legislation written by the  department of justice, but much of the legislation turns out  to have nothing to do with fighting terrorism. instead, the  legislation contains a host of items which have been on the  bureaucratic wish lists for many years.

17) "we must ignore the peace lobby and show no restraint" says the Independent (hardly!)- London (9-24-01) Bush suspends habeas corpus: legal immigrants may be held without cause: "the Bush administration today announced it is using its powers under the national emergency act to  suspend the right of habeas corpus for all immigrants in the country, including legal immigrants, meaning that any immigrant in the u.s. right now can be held indefinitely by the police or government without trial or demonstration of cause to hold them." and daily on the tv they talk of putting chips in us so we can be identified, ostensibly so no Arab can steal our identity. They want us to have our true identity! though no one has yet suggested infringing the rights of U.S. citizens, the move is a frightening first step to a national tyranny, based on perpetual suspension of the constitution in the name of fighting perpetual war." l984 came, l7 years LATE.

19) President Bush has agreed to bail out the airlines with billions of dollars, an industry that was swimming in red ink long before the wtc/pentagon attacks. It is obvious to anyone who has eyes to see, and ears to hear, that American citizens are going to lose their freedom. the process has already begun. eventually the entire world will lose theirs as well. Consider for a moment, the national I.D.card that is being proposed. Like any passport it could be counterfeited. A national ID card can only be concluded as the logical first step. when it is acknowledged, as not accomplishing its task, and then, guess what's waiting in the wings? A switch to micro chip technology would be sought as the only viable solution. 666 I believe the bible prophecy freaks call it. It means that you can wear a chip in your butt just like your Dalmation.

The following websites will be of help if you want to think for yourself

NOMINEES for the best website of the year are:

<http://www.geocities.com/lord_visionary/wake_up_america.html

<http://www.barefootsworld.net/

<http://www.aic.net/kalliste

http://www.almartinraw.com

<http://www.kathleenkeating.com/

<http://www.rense.com

<http://www.davidicke.com

this man D.I. has serious delusions about the 14 families being reptiles, implanted on earth, but leave it be. His info on the rept...err the oligarchs, is good.

<http://www.debka.com

<http://www.trufax.org/

<http://www.skolnicksreport.com/

<http://www.ambilac.com/

<http://www.williamcooper.com

<http://www.mindcontrolforum.com/

<http://www.ascensionresearch.org/jesuits.html

<http://www.bbcoa.com

<http://www.truthbeknown.com

<http://www.contrailconnection.com/

<http://www.carnicom.com-contrails.htm

<http://www.disclosureproject.org

<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/camps.htm

and at 200,000 hits a day, the winner..?

<http://www.rumormillnews.com

When you have surfed around there, and read just a few articles, you’ll be ready to play this Agatha Christie Solve the Mystery of who killed the Big Twins game, armed with the following secret maps I'm going to give you of what you should be seeking, searching out...

1.) FOREIGN ALLIES. What if IQ 80 Bush Jr. really had no idea that the terrorists were coming. (cough!).Very unlikely as we have seen but what if there was actually a nation state that did this as a covert military action. Someone behind Osama. Someone running him. Who might that be? http://www.morphmaster.com/binladen.htm  (surf there). Who was close to Osama in his lifetime? Someone was running him before or after the USA ran him in the 80's. Reporters who know him say he’s a happy space case dunce. Kind of like our old friend Lee Harvey Oswald whose last words alive were ' I'm a Patsy.' In another famous, CIA/OSS/SS action called the JFK HIT. It took a team of sharp shooters on the GrassyKnoll to take out JFK. Look at the Twins Murder. It was was waaaay too organized. The terrorists are said to have spoken German. Residents there for a long time, maybe? What German Terrorist movements exists full of  ex nazi handlers who work the local natives aligned with a faction of the ancient Teutonic OSS/ CIA/ SS? Working the European end of the street on behalf of the Planet's mega oligarchs, the Cash numero unos of the planet? Who but a devious Dr. Strangelove Mastermind could have created a German based Arab branch of the Meiner Badhof gang? You do know that after WWII,  half the SS was moved to Langley, the other half stayed in Europe to watch the Commies. The NWO CIA  has had ex nazis running its think tanks since '45..

Next, SO WHAT  if they had Arab names? They still could be GERMANIFIED Arabs. In Germany, having an Arab is like having a Rottweiler. Maybe the poor Arabs are patsies. Maybe the Taliban was a kind of red herring bacteria allowed to grow rife through the middle east so that the Nazi/ NWO OPEC CIA could demonstrate it was high time for Sulfa. It was warrented and they should be allowed to bring in the bleach.

Why did IQ 80's handlers take out 6k people and blame the Stone Age Al-Qaeda? What did they stand to gain if Arabs were implicated? OK. Think back. What did Hitler gain when he got people to believe that THREE DEAD POLACKS he'd dressed up in GERMAN uniforms were HIS OWN GERMAN BOYS, 'attacked on the border by Nasty old Poland' in 1939? He got to have WWII making his handlers happy.

What did Lyndon Johnson gain when he made it seem that a simple lightning strike on the high seas was a VIET CONG attack on US Battleships? Answer: He got to send US soldiers to Nam. (before only instructors were there, it was a local civil war, remember?) Then Lyndon was trying to nab the richest oil field of planet which is right off shore south of Nam for his Handlers. The Seven SISTERS wanted that war. Dutch Petroleum, Mobil, Exon, Shell, etc..

The Commander of that American battleship later said it was just lightning flashes. Said so in his bio! 56,000 American lives later. And what did FDR get when he let Japs bomb Hawaii? To get his peacenik people to enter a EUROPEAN war waving flags! So here, 2001, what’s the cui bonum of an oil war and in whose lap do the cui bonum goodies possibly land? Follow the money trail of the future. Sniff the air blowing down upon your sons and daughters. What are the other possible future scenarios and cui bonums of re-zoning the mideast into Exxonia? Mobilia? Instead of Iraq and Iran? DIRTY AIR is what. Our babies dying of cancer of the lungs, tumors in the brain as every Chinaman gets a Ford.

They want to sell us cars and gasoline forever. We can run fine on electric cars, ask Ed Begley Jr. but they want us in hock to the company store. Now that sounds pretty venal (of them, not me. I'm just reporting it) but why else would they risk throwing planet into war? Is there anything else they might want over there? Goats? Harem girl with cymbals? Camels? NO. OIL and only OIL. And where is it? IN THE CASPIAN. Russia has it. That's why RUSSIA is in on this. She is selling us the oil, she is drilling it. she enters the world economy and only this war gets her in. (Heck, every war does!) I say let her in, but let her sell us Russian art, fur coats, electric cars, anything but OIL to befoul the planet's air with fuel! FOSSIL FUEL is sheer poison!

Ten possible reasons why the rich and greedy would commit, or allow the commission of the crimes in new york and d.c. and blame the taliban:

1.) Prior to sept. 11, 2001: (1) the world was about to enter a deep recession/depression because the super rich could not find a single thing worth investing in. They had tried everything, moved factories to the third world, paying a dollar a day salaries, which threw US citizens out of work. They build/ tried to sell cheaper washingmachines and cars, but as Marx predicted, at that point, NOBODY anywhere could afford them. Sales slowed to a trickle. The rich pulled their money out of everything! They recognized the stock market was bogus. They had to regroup. Depression is when the people stop buying, as they are in debt. That debt is a result of high prices, low wages, the growing inequities, the lack of the ‘famed’ Keynesian "trickle down" and the gross exploitation of labor in the USA and all over the world.

2.) Create an enemy to take the heat. Destruction of the WTC gives the appearance that this phenomenon is the result of the "terrorists" attack. it makes hungry, angry disenfranchised, 'outcrowd' third worlders, who ‘won’t work their way up in the world, seem puny, jealous, miserable, backbiting and makes all those who may inwardly also be a little jealous of wealth guilty and quiet.

4.) The wtc property was sold  only two weeks before the attack by the INTERNATIONAL MONEY FUND,  (Chase manhattan, Citibank and the ostensible 'owner', the Port Authority of NYC who all together HAD owned the twin towers. They sold for 3.2 billion, a huge profit by the way, for an Eco-disaster bldg that every Arab psychopath was KNOWN to be targeting...! And they sold it to an individual, Silverstein who is still in court in March 2003, trying to get insurance for losses. Poor man (now) bought the  ultimate pig in a poke! The property was 30 years old, (from time of opening) and in need of millions of dollars in renovation and repairs.

5.) the airline industry was about to go bankrupt due to mismanagement, high fuel costs and simply having too many planes for the declining passenger volume. now they can blame their troubles on the wtc attack and get billions of dollars in government bail-out cash.

(6) George Dubya, IQ 80, and his Dad's friends in the Houston oil community had just consummated the biggest merger of oil related businesses ever, with 3 partners. First, kuwait as a 17% partner, next, cia propriatary global marine, and third, houston based sta fe petrol, all of career CIA guy Bush Sr's oil pals. A war on the arabs might well put them in a position to confiscate many oilfields and other minerals in the middle east, turn Afghanistan to toast, so they can lay pipes wall to wall and get the huge ruski oil deposits to the saudis for processing.

(7) The "military-industrial complex" Ike warned us about cannott make their huge profits on weapons and other war related hardware without a war and the army can't make fruit salad for its bosom without war.

8.) There’s nothing like a "good" war to rally the misinformed public around the corrupt and fraudulent government, taking the focus off of all of the stupidity, criminal conduct and immorality of so many of the "honorable gentlemen" in congress and the other branches of government.

9.) There is nothing in the social security and medicare trusts except i.o.u's from THE USA to its people. the money was spent long ago, and there’s no way that theretirement and medical needs of the "baby-boomers" can be funded. a huge, drawn out war will provide an excuse as to why the money is gone, ie. to pay for the war. (more lies)

10.) Taliban heroin isn't controlled by CIA the way Burma, Thai, Laotian Hmong, Golden Triangle china white was (see Air America the movie --again.) CIA is like the MAFIA. They take out the competition. The French Connection movie (rent it) was about NY COPS taking out the other exporters, the Corsicans, destroying them so that all ingresses from "made in Asia by Americans , i.e. loyal patriotic dope, sold to American addicts, goes to cia coffers and cia nugan hand BCCI type CIA banks. Thanks to Ronnie’s wife nancy, there are less and less addicts every day so no chance CIA wants most of its diminishing dope biz going to competitors! The CIA has been dealing drugs for 52 years with the help of Meyer Lansky's Syndicate, Nixon, the Bush CIA/OIL lineage, and it's rumored with the help of Nixon's pals' Pepsi Cola bottling companies in Vietnam.  http://www.tomdavisbooks.com/library/50yearsciadrug.html

What happened in New York, is indeed, a terrible act, regardless of whom is responsible. like many webs of deceit, we probably will not know the complete truth until much later. what we do know, is that god allowed it. He is in total control and we must have faith in his judgement. Is america now going to have its wings cut with this assault on innocent, little stone age Afghanistan? These and many other questions will eventually be answered. It is our duty to wait and see the hand of the eternal, and just pray for and seek his protection, mercy, love and deliverance from all that seems to be about to come to pass? are we sure that these NWO types need to rejuggle the borders, organize things, chip us, fiche us? for the right reasons? is it useful to the whole? my spiritual friends say ‘everything that happens is perfect.’ My also very spiritual and pragmatic economist friend karl marx said ‘make something better happen than what the men in power are doing for their own solvency. Trickle down is a myth.’

So, if this is the truth, what do we do? read up, study. . intelligence gathering should have many inputs. SEND this article or others like it to the news agencies. The information you read at the URLS above may be rejected by a few,  brain-washed jerks, and it may be reported to those who take orders from the Nazis BY OTHER JERKS who take orders from the Nazis. But so what? If enough of us share the truth, they don't rap knuckles cuz there are too many knuckles to rap.

Surfing to any of these URLS would be a test to see if your head is on your shoulders or if some one else, some robot behind you, is doing your thinking for you. It is quite possible that when you watch CNN and NBC and ABC and even CBS, you are being PLAYED like a lute and led like a rooster in a Tijuana Cockfight into blinding, killing yourself and your sons..

Only by researching can you save your family from being part of this bloody spectacle. Only by using that PC to surf will you save your grandkids from living in a burnt fuel cloud that burns holes in their brain.  Only by demanding that Detroit build ALTERNATIVE fuel cars will you save your great grandchildren from death by bullet or tumor.  Only by volunteering to drive an alt fueled car  will you save your sweet air, your planet's agriculture, your descendants.  Only by writing your Congressman and saying it in your own, quiet way in a hard copy letter, (they don't read email!) And while you're at it, drop a note to alt fuel car proponent Ed Begley Jr. at c/o Screen Actors Guild, Sunset Blvd. Hollywood 90028 saying "tell me more, who can I write to for details?" Only then, when you've communicated to your elected officials, can you say that you did your job to keep your children from fighting a decade long war that would kill millions,  enrich a few billionaires, poison every nation's air with this demon smog making fossil fuel, which has thrown the planet entirely off kilter so that nothing clean grows here so that your grandchildren starve to death.

We are at a precipice. A cliff is before us. Don't leap into war. Our name is not LEMMING. We do not jump foolishly into the void. We are the Humans of Earth. We have a voice. We have the internet. We type. We read. WE WRITE! We share facts. USE those  TALENTS to stop America from going on another stupid, cruel oil war and one based on lies and fraud at that!