I'm manly, I haul my weight and that of my family.
I will work to take care of them, I don't need subsidies
or tax dollars spent on me. Nor do I want to be taxed
to take care of spineless men who procreate more of
their shiftless kind. Got it? Now lemme alone so I can work!

Me, a peaceful, left of center activist, .. I slammed some progressive, LIBERTARIAN TEABAGGER noses in a door recently. I'm not sorry but Ill confess the whole affair anyway and look contrite. A true TEABAGGER is anti taxes, hates Doles to the poor. Libertarians are against Central Government. They can often be xenophobic ..i.e. anti immigrant, anti Mex, anti-Jew, anti-Latinos andthey hate commie pinko progressives. See the teachings of their GURU: A.F. HAYEK.

This particular group of libertarians on my list (sending news items to me,) was being stridently anti-semitic. These guys would not only post stuff about Jewish bankers being the source of the world’s problems, but they’d rant about it all the time. They nakedly despised the United Nations, they loathe paying taxes as the Gov uses it to take care of too many ‘useless eaters’. Or so they allege. But hey, those are OUR BROTHERS, no? “No, they’re furreigners,’ Libertarians allege. A PC word that’s a racist slur. 

What they deem useless eaters, Blacks, Muslims, Mexicans, are really POOR PEOPLE who will grow up into a huge tax base, one day. They will pay for themselves eventually. And one or two Rothschilds in the I.M.F. and a few Jewish Bilbergers doesn’t make the entire Jewish race the enemy. Just like a few KKK bozos can't do that to blacks. One little murderous revengeful ARIEL SHARON and the all white Christian CIA he rode in on and all Jews are killers?? Well I bleated a little at them and this one Idaho based, true liberterian answered me. 

“True Libertarians live by the golden onto others as you would have them do onto you. We make one pledge, not to initiate violence against another. Granted there are some wackos out there that may say they are libertarians, which really means they want to be free to do whatever they want. But the National Libertarian party is founded on the principles of this country’s constitution and bears in mind that government is violence, hence evil, but a necessary evil, therefore is best kept to a minimum. “

Meaning, can we cancel the war? I want to ask him, but I hold my peace. When talking to teabaggers or libertarians, I have to remember to hold in mind the facts that a.) they love the war on Muslims and B.) they want NO GOVERNMENT at all. For this reason, many are in the new NULLIFICATION MOVEMENT. They want to cancel Federal tax laws they don’t like –doing so on the state level. They don’t want to pay for what they don’t want done, welfare, medicare, Section 8. And I can’t raise the question of IRAQ/ AFGHANISTAN ever as they love killing Muslims, cherish any war Bushes/ Cheney gave us or Mr. OBAMA enlarged on cuz they hate the terrorists who did 911.And don’t care that the actual l9 men on 911 were Egyptians and Saudis raised in Hamburg! So that’s the RIGHT WING PROGRESSIVE.

The far left of the progressive movement is the Green Gaia, tree hugging, pro whale/dolphin/ seallovie-dovies, PETA nuts, 100% anti war, who have empathy for peace and harmony. We have our own way ofcommunicating, whereas the progressive right, the 4x4 warmongering-haters of freedom have their macho way oftalking. So to build a Rainbow Coalition, I will a.) have to personally link more with these types, and b.)encourage both wings to speak the other guy’s lingo. And C.) stay off themes of disagreement, sticking only to the concept of let’s PROTEST TOGETHER.

Now My liberterian writer went on: “If you like Gandhi and his philosophy ofsatyagraha then you are a good libertarian.” GREAT! I am accepted! 

(HMMMM, I had no idea an Idaho Aryan racist Liberterian would even know that word which means non violent, passive resistance.“If however, you desire to effect all manner of social changes thru the power of the government’s gun, (because every law requires violence to enFORCE it), then you disqualify and condemn yourself to live in a world where you will be forever at odds with some faction of your community who disagrees with that particular goal. Therefore, libertarians restrict the use of this gun to defense of ones right to be left alone, i.e. helping out a victim of anothers actions, not a victim of one’s own actions. We believe the private sector is better for addressing other social issues. After all, the salvation army gets you 89cents on the dollar for the poor, the government will get you only 30cents. And that’s not charity, either, its social programming at the point of a gun. 

You want big got it, George Bush is the epitome of what happens when the beast is allowed to grow. Now most democrats refuse to look at the real cause of the world mess and continue to believe that this problem can be solved if we only make government bigger, and get our guy in there. Libertarian thinking is the door out of this merry go round most of the people you quote I would not consider Libertarians at all. And we are not anti Jewish but we are anti zionism, since by definition, zionism is state enforced discrimination. 

LIBERTARIANISM HAS A LOT THAT IS GOOD. These guys are great dads, noisy, bigoted but they hunt and fish like nobody’s business. They grow potatoes. My Lib friend grew MEADOWS FULL OF OPIUM I guess he was tense. He never told me what he did with the pods, probably had an online business of some kind. One day I dialed him up and he was dead. His daughter said she just found him that way. Alone in a cabin in Utah. Chain smoking camels. Tension kills. I miss him.

My problem with liberterian teabaggers as a PHILOSOPHY is that --

a.)they hate progressive liberals who are tree-huggy &compassionate. (who protect wetbacks who’ll pick our crops, save farmers)

b.)They hate Jews and do diatribes on Israel, Zionism controlling American politicians which shows they’re racially biased to the point of forgetting the primary rule of politics, I love the enemy of my enemy, I hate the friend of my enemy . Israelisare Washington’ssecret police, cops and international spies in the entire European and Arabic and Muslim third world. No argument there, right?Libertarians are supposed to LOATHE third worlders so they’re inconsistent here. Jews serve America. So right there they side with the New Radicals who hate Israel as it suppresses all emerging Muslim groups seeking autonomy. 

C.) the Libertarians hate the U.N. as it represents the rights of the Third World vis a vis FIRST WORLD (seeming to follow fascist transnational interests.) Again, some xenophobic myopia. The third world has rights, they’re kind of like baby nations, nurseries full of them, wailing, poking each other, emotional and the U.N. hears their complaints well. The U.N. alsopushes the transnationals around a little, via National Leaders making them relent on baby nations, like Gaza for instance & COUGH UP THE DOUGH and cut the infant nations or disenfranchised ethnic groups some serious slack.LIBERTARIANScall the U.N. a commie conspiracy. Why? For being charitable? I don’t get that. I think it’s kneejerkholdover prejudicefrom the Mc Carthy Fifties. 

Mc Carthy was right about there being a lot of compassionate progressives around tilting toward Marxism in the 30’s and 40’s. There were socialist mayors all over the blue states. This happened because huge numbers of activists were appalled at World War I, at the behavior of the first nations and these left-leaning people had embraced the peasant revolution in Spain (joined it to fight and die.) They admired Marxism and adopted socialist solutions to 1929 DEPRESSION problems and FDR carried them out. This took a typically Marxist DIALECTICor CAGE RATTLING DIALOGUE and a battle with the System. And they got many benefits for the poor.Nobody could argue that dissidence and activism had NOT worked to benefit all.So, what was the big deal? Many English Oxford extremely intellectual types led that compassionate parade. The thing was -- Stalinism was just then stepping on transnational holdings in Russia, mines, doing what Allende did later with Copper in Chile so the big boys wanted Stalinism & Marxism dead and gone. Progressive liberals cannot mention the N word ‘nationalization’. Ever. So they threw the compassionate baby out with the Muddy Marxist bathwater.

And we get AYN RAND *raised in Russia, aglow with love for America and when she said Commies stink the American Public tended to believe her LITURGY of No welfare no handouts, make everyone work. Except that she herself took SOCIAL SECURITY when she hit 65. Then there was Senator Mc carthy, Tail Gunner Joe (his nick name,) taking over Congress, doing anti-left P.R., creating a strong right wing, polarizing American so that many also went into sympathy for liberal, progressive Marxism. First the witch hunt, then Mc Carthyism passed away, it was too rabid and then the truth coming out about Stalin killing 30 million Russians…made it easy to give Marxism a bad name. But it was too late for the Revolution After the horrors of the Joe Mc CarthyBlackballing period,leftist progressives went into hiding and didn’t show their faces until Vietnam, the next big unpopular war. They had a much more loveable face by then, Tie-dyed. Not Pro-Stalin. That war was one macho Libertarians supported bigtime --so bottom line, Libertarians are warlike Huns, manly, patriotic, cruel, tough and all the things a compassionate liberal must be wary of becoming or allowing to swagger around making conversions; I don’t care if they can catch bass or not. Libertarians must go. They’re the G.O.P in lumberjack shirts, is all. Same party line. However, as the Recession worsens, I see that we need cross culture participation in the Revolution. A rainbow coalition. The SDS fighting tripling of college fees in one decade, along side the Black Panthers whose grandkids can’t get into college now. And every other group that is wondering to what office they apply to volunteer for PROTEST now that their house, job and Unemployment insurance aregone.