LIBERTERIANS—Progressive? Or just another word for a CHEAP, MISERLY, FEARFUL BIGOTED XENOPHOBE with a GUN?

 

Me, a peaceful, left of center activist, .. I slammed some progressive LIBERTERIAN noses in a door recently. I’m not sorry but I’ll confess the whole affair anyway and look contrite. A Liberterian is a  xenophobic anti-Jew, anti-Latino progressive. This particular group on my list was being stridently anti-semitic. These guys would post stuff about Jewish bankers being the source of the world’s problems, but they’d rant about it all the time. They nakedly despised the United Nations, they loathe  paying taxes as the Gov takes care of too many ‘useless eaters’, they say.  But that’s a racist slur. HEY, what they deem useless eaters are really POOR PEOPLE who grow up into more of  a tax base. They pay for themselves eventually. And  one or two Rothschilds in the I.M.F. don’t make the entire Jewish race the enemy. One little murderous revengeful ARIEL SHARON and the CIA he rode in on and all Jews are killers?? Well  I bleated a little at them and this one Idaho based, true liberterian answered me.

“True Libertarians live by the golden rule......do onto others as you would have them do onto you. We make one pledge, not to initiate violence against another. Granted there are some wackos out there that may say they are libertarians, which really means they want to be free to do whatever they want. But the National Libertarian party is founded on the principles of this country’s constitution and bears in mind that government is violence, hence evil, but a necessary evil, therefore is best kept to a minimum. “

Oh, yes, I forgot to mention. They want almost NO GOVERNMENT at all. They don’t want to pay for what they don’t want.

“If you like Gandhi and his philosophy of satyagraha then you are a good libertarian. (HMMMM, I had no idea an Idaho Aryan racist Liberterian would even know that word!)

If however, you desire to effect all manner of social changes thru the power of the government’s gun, (because every law requires violence to enFORCE it), then you disqualify and condemn yourself to live in a world where you will be forever at odds with some faction of your community who disagrees with that particular goal. Therefore, libertarians restrict the use of this gun to defense of ones right to be left alone, i.e. helping out a victim of anothers actions, not a victim of one’s own actions. We believe the private sector is better for addressing other social issues. After all, the salvation army gets you 89cents on the dollar for the poor, the government will get you only 30cents. And that’s not charity, either, its social programming at the point of a gun.

You want big government...............you got it, George Bush is the epitome of what happens when the beast is allowed to grow. Now most democrats refuse to look at the real cause of the world mess and continue to believe that this problem can be solved if we only make government bigger, and get our guy in there. Libertarian thinking is the door out of this merry go round most of the people you quote I would not consider Libertarians at all. And we are not anti jewish but we are anti zionism, since by definition, zionism is state enforced discrimination.

He signed it with his name and his website, but that site’s dead now!

LIBERTARIANISM HAS A LOT THAT IS GOOD.  These guys are noisy, bigoted but they hunt and fish like nobody’s business. They grow potatoes. My friend grew MEADOWS FULL OF OPIUM Poppies.  He never told me what he did with it.

My problem with them as a PHILOSOPHY is that a.) they hate Jews and do diatribes on it. And they hate the U.N. as it represents the rights of the Third World vis a vis FIRST WORLD (read transnationals.) and that’s myopia. The third world has rights. The U.N. hears their complaints. They push the transnationals around a little, give them a run for its money. Oh that’s one more thing LIBERTERIANS do. They call the U.N. a commie conspiracy. I don’t get it myself. I think that’s some holdover philosophical angle from the Mc Carthy Fifties. What do you think?

 

*      *     *        *        *        *    *