[to Bottom of Page]
The mean operant level of bar presses was 3.35, the mean asymptote was 175.78. The mean number of responses in the SD and S conditions during the 7 experimental sessions is presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Mean number of responses in the SD and Sd conditions in the 7 experimental sessions.
Figure 2 shows the rate of acquisition of discrimination. There was a 49% increase in the number of bar presses in the SD condition and a 62% decrease in the number of bar presses in the Sd condition.
A first ttest comparing the mean number of bar presses in the SD condition (M=226.3) with the mean number of bar presses in the Sd condition (M=45) in session 7, found support for the hypothesis that the behavior in the reinforced condition will increase while behavior in the nonreinforced condition will decrease, t (7) = 10.97, p < 0.01 .
A second ttest comparing the mean number of bar presses in the SD condition (M=151.75) with the mean number of bar presses in the Sd condition (M=117.88) in session 1 to ascertain whether the rats could discriminate in the first experimental session, failed to find significance, t(7) = 1.8, p >0.05, indicating that the rats could not discriminate between the lighton, lightoff at the beginning of the discrimination training.
A third ttest comparing the mean number of bar presses in the SD condition in session 1 (M=151.75) with the mean number of bar presses in the SD condition in session 7 (M=226.37) to ascertain whether or not there was an increase number of bar presses in the reinforced condition found significance, t (7) = 2.58, p <0.05, indicating that there was an increase in bar pressing during the SD condition between the first and seventh session.
A fourth ttest comparing the mean number of bar presses in the Sd condition in session 1 (M=117.88) with the mean number of bar presses in the S condition in session 7 (M=45) to ascertain whether or not there was a decrease in number of bar presses in the nonreinforced condition found significance, t (7) = 5.29, p <0.01, indicating that there was a decrease in the number of bar presses during the S condition.
The fifth ttest, comparing the mean number of bar presses in the session 7 (M = 271.3) and the asymptote (M = 175.78), did find significance, t(7) = 7.16, p <0.01, indicating that the number of bar presses did significantly increase during discrimination training.
The sixth ttest was to determine the session during which the rat learned to discriminate. A ttest performed comparing the mean number of bar presses in the SD and the mean number of bar presses in the S conditions of session 2, found significance, t(7) = 8.37, p <0.01. That the rats had learned to discriminate by the second session of discrimination training.
The final ttest comparing the mean number of bar presses in the SD conditions (M=168.5) with the mean number of bar presses in the S conditions (M=34.12) in the control session found significance, t(7) = 9.33, p <0.01 indicating that the rats had learned to discriminate, and were not responding merely to the passage of time.
[Return to index] [Previous section] [Next section]
[Abstract] [Method] [Results] [Discussion] [Reference]
[To Andy's Psychology Menu Page] [To Welcome Page]
How you can help... I hope you enjoyed these pages and found them useful in some way. Now, here's how you can help. Some of you have expressed a desire to help support these pages financially, I thought about it, and here it is... All I'm asking is a small donation ($3.00  $5.00). Use of these pages is still free, no charge, you may continue to use them free of charge, as much as you want, as often as you want, anytime you want... But you can also use the links below to donate and help keep these pages here, and help the site expand. You may use your PayPal account, or most any credit card. Thank you for your continued support.
Select this button to donate $3.00

Select this button to donate $5.00


