Ottoman Women's Clothing

Note that this page is not quite complete - i'm still adding and improving it - but i wanted to get it on-line to make this information accessible.

Paintings and illustrations of Ottoman men are commonplace and easy to find. For example, the entire Sulaymaname, an 16th century illustrated book on the life of Sultan Suleyman, includes no Ottoman Muslim women and only a few non-Muslim women from within and outside the Empire. Additionally, the vast majority of surviving garments, not to mention the armor, in the Topkapi Saray from SCA period were worn by men. This means there is far more SCA-period information available for men than for women.

Because of the difficulty of finding SCA-period illustrations of Ottoman women, i have gathered a selection here to illustrate that typical garments of an Ottoman Muslim woman living in a major city. Additionally, because of limited illustrations, i have included some from the 17th century which show clothing like that worn in the 16th century.

Here is my take on 16th century Ottoman women's clothing. A woman wears multiple layers of garments, depending on where she is, the weather, and the formality of the situation. In the harem, where almost no men will see her, a woman may wear her undergarments plus one short coat. In a formal situation she may also wear four layers, the topmost layer being a coat of brilliant elaborate silk fabric. Out of doors she wears about four layers of garments, the topmost a muted colored wool coat.

As you can see, the outfits are quite attractive, and there is no reason why a woman won't look lovely dancing in an SCA-period outfit, rather than a 19th c. or fantasy outfit.

Basic Women's Garments
gömlek -- under tunic
çakshir - under pants (optional)
chirka -- short under jacket
....... - small cap
shalvar - trousers
entari -- basic fitted coat
yelek --- short outer jacket (optional)
kaftan -- loose ceremonial coat (optional)
....... - small sheer white "veil" on back of head
feraçe -- woolen outer coat (optional)
yashmak - several scarves covering face and neck

Those marked optional are not necessary for one's very first SCA outfit.
This is not a comment on their necessity for women in the 15th-17th centuries.

Under Layer

Lady in white underwearwoman in underclothesUnder tunic
Gömlek - either goomlek (oo as in moon) or gumlek (u as in gum), i'm not sure which.
This is the basic undergarment, a sheer white tunic that pulls on over the head, with a long slit in the center front.

I know of none that have survived from the SCA-period Ottoman Empire. In art, there is no complete picture of a woman's gömlek, for reasons of modesty. The hem falls to mid-calf, or sometimes to the ankle. The "skirt" is quite full. Usually the sleeves are voluminous and quite wide at the wrist, draping without drawstrings or ties. The fabric is quite sheer and there appears to be embroidery on or along the seams

Since we are not certain what they were made of "in period", i use white cotton batiste, which is a very light sheer cotton. One could also use handkerchief linen as sheer as you can fine, or lightweight china silk/ silk habotai. I recommend cotton or linen for their washability and functionality, particularly in dealing with bodily moisture. If you plan to wear this in hot humid weather, i recommend linen, which is cooler than cotton. White wool might have been used in winter. It is very cold in a stone house with no central heating in Eastern Europe or Anatolia in winter, and some men's wool gömleks survive from later times.

I suggest using the pattern for the 14th century Persian pirihan and enlarging the sleeves
Extant Fourteenth Century Persian Pirihan/Kamiz

Rashid's Pattern

Roxane's Pattern - sorry, Roxane's website is gone.

<-- Woman in White, ink and gold wash on paper, beginning 17th c. --- Woman in Red, European oil painting, mid-17th c. -->
both pictures from 9000 Years of the Anatolian Woman
crepe chakshirUnder pants:
Çakshir (chakshir)
It is unclear whether women wore some form of underpants, but it is highly likely that they did. The visible pants are quite often of elaborate expensive fabric, which one would want to protect from soiling. I have found a photo of one pair of çakshir, which is made of a silk and cotton fabric, mostly sheer and with a couple opaque satin stripes.

These appear to be about upper or mid calf length, but some paintings show women in soft, loose, ankle-length white pants, so until i have more information, i would say either is a possibility. Choose the length based on your comfort levels and situation of use.

I make mine of white linen, but cotton is also a possibility. For reasons of comfort, I recommend against silk dupioni, but i have heard that some folks have success with china silk/habotai in light weights. I find that if i am perspiring, silk is not effective.

Photo credit, below...

Foot Covering
Indoors, when not barefoot, women often wore sock-like foot coverings that extended up to their lower or mid-calf. These were made of woven cloth - often elaborate silk brocades - or soft yellowish leather.

Going to the bath (hammam) a women wore wooden qubqob, flat slip-on sandals elevated by two tall wooden crosspieces, rather like Japanese geta, often with elaborate chipcarving and ivory inlay. They had one or two straps around the instep, worn with leather socks or bare feet.

Head Covering
Women always wear some sort of cap - a simple pillbox shape is appropriate for the 16th century (see Codex Vindobonensis pictures, below). The tall narrow cap in the pictures above are late 16th - early 17th century - the woman in red is later, which can be told in part because her cap is taller.
Jewelry is modest in size and quantity, NOT like what ATS dancers wear. All that ethnic jewelry, as lovely as it is, just isn't right for Ottoman outfits. Gold jewelry is what is desirable. Silver is for those who can't afford gold. Since i can't afford all that gold, either, i wear gold washed jewelry and brass bracelets. *Small* gold hoops, a small simple necklace of gold, gold bracelets are appropriate. Pearl drop earrings and long strands of small pearls can also work.

Second Layer

woman in undergarmentsottoman trousersFitted Underjacket
Hirka / Chirka (the "ch" is pronounced as in Bach)
This is a short tight coat, cut like the entari (see third layer), but more fitted in the body, with the hem about mid-thigh length to above the knee. There are several sleeve possibilities. It is worn over the gomlek and under the entari.

The example at the left does not actually have an oddly shaped "window of opportunity". First, the "artist" was an untrained European, so his drawings leave something to be desired in terms of verisimilitude. Additionally, it is clear in other paintings and surviving garments that the front is cut straight down, but is pulling apart across the fullness of the bust. In this case, the garment has a small circular neckline right at the base of the neck.

The bright red chirka above right had buttons from the neck down, but is left open across the bust. It also appears to have a small standing collar. It is hard to tell about the chirka on the Woman in White - it may have a fully buttoned front or it may have a rounded V-neck.

If cut "correctly" it can provide bust support with no modern supplements. I have no guarantee that this was done "in period", but it's possible.

The same garment names are used in Turkish for centuries, yet the garment shapes change radically. This word is used for a couple different garments in the 19th through 21st centuries, quite different from that of the 16th c. Several scholarly sources i've read call it hirka or chirka (Encyclopedia of Islam, 8th ed., for example), so i will also. I have noticed it called a "cardigan" in some modern Turkish writing in English, but in my experience a cardigan is knit, whereas these garments are of woven cloth.

Pants / Trousers
Shalwar also written şalwar, salvar, or shalvar
These are narrow at the ankles and widen as they go up the thigh. Quite a few have survived from the late 16th and 17th centuries. Shalvar are often made of the same kinds of fabrics as the entari, but they should NOT match.

In some of the accompanying pictures you can see that some shalvar are made much longer than the actual woman's leg, and of very soft fabric that pools around the leg.

Big poofy so-called "harem pants" are *way* out of period for the SCA. Please, i beg of you, don't make them or wear them. I'm groveling, please, don't do it.

Third Layer

woman's entariblue entari, another viewFitted Long Coat
Entari (also written enteri, anteri, antari, etc.)
This is the basic garment worn by both men and women. It is an ankle length "coat" that buttons down the front. Most often it has a high round neckline in the 15th and 16th centuries. It is often leaft unbuttoned from sternum up and from waist down. It is somewhat fitted in the body but has no darts or tucks, no curved or shaped seams. It's all done with straight seaming. To accommodate the hips it has side gores. To accommodate the bust it has somewhat large underarms gussets.

This late 16th, possibly early 17th, century medium-light blue entari has decorations of silver leaf attached to the base silk with an adhesive. On the outside, and in the sleeves, notice how groups of three circles are arranged to form çintamani-like triangles, with a rather different pattern on the salmon-orange-colored neck facing.

Notice the cut-away shape of the hem of the "wing" sleeve, made to be worn over a chirka with long tight sleeves.

Left picture, from Topkapi Textiles; right picture from 9000 Years of the Anatolian Woman
Fitted Outer Jacket
This is a very short coat worn over the entari in cold weather. It gets pretty darn cold in what is now modern Turkey in the winter. It is shorter than the hirka - crotch to mid-thigh length - and a little less fitted than the entari so it will fit over it. It has sleeve variations. It is possible that it was not worn in the 16th century.

Note that the 19th-20th c. Levantine yelek is a very different garment.
Head Covering
A veil of sheer white cloth is worn over the cap and hangs down the woman's back. I don't know of what they made theirs, i suspect linen. I use white silk chiffon, but sheer white handkerchief linen, sheer white cotton batiste, or lightweight china silk/habotai would also work in the SCA. I anchor mine on with pearl headed pins. As you can see in the pictures from the Codex Vindobonensis below, a fillet (like a narrow headband) is used to hold the veil onto the cap.

Ceremonial Layer

Loose unfitted Coat
This sort of garment is worn by men and women in formal, ceremonial situations, such as religious or state events. It is ankle length and unfitted, large and voluminous. It has the cut-away "angel wing" sleeves. Made of rich luxurious fabric, such as pure silk brocaded and cut velvet, quite often red with metallic gold, they can be lined and even trimmed with fur for warmth in winter.

Head Covering
The cap with a veil.

Foot Covering
Little slip-on flats or low boots are worn over the brocade or soft leather socks

Outdoor Layer

mid-17th c. feraceblue feracered feraceOvercoat
Feraçe (ferajeh)
This is a large loose coat worn over all the other garments of layers one through three. It was usually made of wool and in muted modest colors, such as dull medium blue, grey, brown. In period they have modest simple round neckholes. Some summer feraçe were of silk and had short sleeves. The feraçe often had slits over both hips so the woman could put her hands inside to keep them warm in winter or to access a pouch.

Note that it is only beginning in the 18th century that feraçe have huge broad collars hanging in back to the waist or even to the hem.
Head Covering
Yashmak (yaşmak)
This is a scarf or set of scarves worn over the cap and covering the lower face and neck. The black-and-white picture on the left is from later in the 17th century, as evidenced by the hat that is wider at the top than the bottom, covered by the yashmak.
Eye Mask
This horsehair mask, often black, covering the upper face, appears in some pictures.
Foot Covering
Women often wore sturdier soled boots over their socks and shoes.
<--- late 17th century drawing ----- two 16th century examples --->

130 Years of Ottoman Women in European Art

bellini's drawing of a serving woman

Drawing of a serving woman, circa 1490
Giovanni Bellini
drawn from life when the highly trained and famous Italian Renaissance artist was in Istanbul

In the harem yet more women
more women in the palace

Codex Vindobonensis 8626
Believed painted between 1586 and 1591
by an unknown south German artist in the entourage of Bartolemeo di Pezzana, ambassador of the Holy Roman Emperor Rudolph II to the Sublime Porte.
Now in the Austrian National Library, Vienna

woman in undergarments Lady in Gold Entari Lady in Orange Entari woman in undergarments

From Englishman Peter Mundy's journal of his trip to Istanbul

The woman on the left wears white gomlek and shalvar (which appear to be of very soft material), a short-sleeved patterned chirka, and bare feet in kubkob. Embroidery is visible along the seams of the gomlek, the gomlek skirt and sleeve hems, and the lower hem of the shalvar legs.

The woman on the center-left wears no apparent gomlek, an orange chirka, something with blue patterned sleeves, stiff blue brocade shalvar, a dark gold entari with short "wing" sleeves, and white bootees.

The woman on the center-right wears white gomlek and shalvar (which appear to be of very soft material), a blue patterned chirka (see the sleeves), an orange entari with short "wing" sleeves, a dark blue yelek with no sleeves, and yellow leather bootees.

The woman on the right wears a patterned yelek over her plain enteri. The front hem of her chirka is peeking through the opening of the entari above the white of her gomlek. She wears patterned shalvar and sock-bootees of a different brocade.

Illustrations on this page from various sources, including:

Section C. Seljuk and Ottoman Periods, pp. 190-295
by Dr. Filiz Çagman and Dr. Banu Mahir
9000 Years of the Anatolian Woman
Turkish Republic Ministry of Culture General Directorate of Monuments and Museums
Istanbul, 1993.
ISBN 975-17-1186-X

"Fashion at the Ottoman Court: The Topkapi Museum Collection",
Section I, Sixteenth and Seventeenth-Century Women's Fashion at the Ottoman Palace, pp. 4-17
by Hulya Tezcan, translated by Sungur Savran.
The photo of the burumcuk chakshir is on page 14.
Published in: P Magazine Art Culture Antiques Bi-annual, Issue 3, Spring-Summer 2000



For the gomlek, use pure white fabric, or off-white/ivory if you prefer. Cotton is good, especially batiste, as is handkerchief weight linen. In this case habotai/china silk would have a suitable weight. I think that undergarments would more likely have been cotton or linen, and that cotton and linen serve the function better than silk at dealing with bodily moisture. In the winter men wore ivory wool gomleks - i don't know if women did, too.

For entaris (and chirkas and yeleks and kaftans), silk is best, of course:-) I buy dupioni when it's on sale (between US$7.50 and $10 a yard) and mostly i get the 54" wide stuff. I realize the slubby fabric would not have been used as outer fabric, but it's what i can afford and still be silk, and it has the right hand. I get both solid color and shot silk. Shot silk has one color in the warp and one in the weft - the surface is the more closely set color, while the other shows in the folds, lending an iridescent quality. Most habotai/china silk is too thin for outer fabric, so I use it for lining because it's fairly inexpensive.

I also buy some mostly-cotton upholstery fabric when i find it on sale with woven Ottoman-oid patterns. I even managed to score some that was a copy of an actual late 16th-early 17th c. Ottoman fabric! Such fabric needs to have a soft hand. If it's stiff, it will work for a khaftan - the outermost formal "coat" - but it won't work for the antari, which needs softer fabric for easier fitting and better drape.

These multicolored woven upholstery fabrics available at the typical fabric store are commonly called "brocade" or "tapestry", but are neither. They are actually Jacquard woven and because of the Jacquard weaving process, the fabrics tend to be thicker and generally much stiffer than period brocades and the threads themselves are quite often thicker as well. Since true brocades are out of the price range of most SCAdians (starting at a few hundred dollars per yard and going up into the multi-thousands of dollars per yard) we are generally forced to buy Jacquard simulations

Damask weaves are also suitable, although i haven't seen as many of them in Ottoman garments. Damask fabric usually has the same color warp and weft, which because of the way it is woven, with long floating threads, has a clearly discernable textured pattern. There are also Damasks with one color in the warp and a different one in the weft - in this case the pattern on both sides will be the same, but in opposite colors - for example, one side could have blue flowers on a yellow ground while the other has yellow flowers on a blue ground.

I also buy a few printed cottons if they have a very Ottoman pattern and gold metal stamping. These are best lined with silk and best worn with silk over them, because otherwise the cotton will stick to the other garments.


There are several chief characteristics of Ottoman fabrics. One, they are highly formal - no random scattering of motifs. Second, the motifs are usually on a large to very large scale. The patterns in some period Ottoman fabrics only repeat 1-1/2 times from shoulder to hem on a tall man's garment! Third, the patterns are often arranged vertically, such as tall wavy lines of highly stylized flowers.

Common motifs include pomegranates, carnations, tulips/lilies, cypress trees, crescent moons, abstract patterns arranged in ogee forms (sort of vertical ovals with pointed ends). One very distinct pattern is çintimani (pronounced chin-tah-mah-nee) - in the individual motif, three circles are arranged in a triangle which is frequently accompanied by two short wavy lines. The significance of this is uncertain - there is speculation that it is a Central Asian pattern, similar to one seen in Tibetan fabrics. The woman seated on the far left of the first Codex Vindobonensis picture has an entari with this pattern in white on blue.


Fabric for entaris, chirkas, and yeleks would make use of prestige colors like kermes red, a rich cool red. In surviving garments and fabric fragments there is much more red fabric than any other color, often with golden-yellow designs, sometimes with other accent colors. There's a much lesser amount of indigo blue (which can dye anywhere from very pale to nearly black). Then there's some amazing fabric that has a nearly black ground with a fairly large pattern of sinuous vines and flowers which are red, yellow, blue, and white. There are also some garments of dull medium green (greener than olive drab, but not much), and some using brown, usually partnered with white. Metallic gold threads were often woven into the pattern.

Linings tend to be olive green, teal blue, red, or golden yellow - NEVER matching the outer fabric.

Feraçes were usually of wool in a modest color. Muted blue, grey, or brown are more likely than light or bright colors, since in public modesty is essential, and pale or bright colors are considered less modest.

Questions? Comments? Suggestions?
Send e-mail to Anahita

Back to Dar Anahita Annex
Back to Dar Anahita Courtyard
Back to Dar Anahita Directory

This page first published on 02 May 2005
and copyright Anahita al-Qurtubiyya bint 'abd al-Karim al-hakam al-Fassi