Electronic Voting - A Non-Partisan Issue
Election Results Can Be Manipulated If No Paper Trail
ELECTRONIC VOTING
DANGERS of E-VOTING
--- Warnings
--- Democracy at Stake
--- Report from UK
"BLACK BOX VOTING"
--- Work of Bev Harris
------ Get Book Free!
VOTER-VERIFIED PAPER BALLOTS
--- Bev Harris's Sites
Or -- "Voter-Verifiable Paper Trail"
HELP FROM HR 2239
--- Republican Sponsors
--- Legal Support
--- Bev H. Comments
... INTERIM SOLUTION
WHY PRIVATIZE VOTING AT ALL?
WHY NOT RETURN to PAPER BALLOTS?
DIEBOLD WARS
------ Diebold Gives In!
------ Bev H.Comments
--- Diebold for Bush
NOT JUST DIEBOLD
IS eSLATE BETTER?
--- Potential Problems
NEW POSSIBILITY-- VOTING with "FROGS"

"... Even more serious would be a rogue or malicious programmer working at Diebold who could put in some hidden functionality that could cause the outcome of the election to be later determined by the attacker."                         
            ---Prof Avi Rubin, Johns Hopkins University

E-voting: Democratic or dangerous?

By Richard Black
BBC Science correspondent
 
The complete article is currently (3/28/04) available on the BBC.com website at-- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3169706.stm [found through a Google search by article title on the same date]
 
Quotes--
 
... In the wake of the fiasco in Florida during the last presidential election in 2000, [electronic voting] machines are seen by many in the US as a way of ensuring a fair vote. They are slowly being introduced across the nation. ...

But some computer experts believe e-voting could actually make fraud much easier. ...

One is Avi Rubin, technical director of the Information Security Institute at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

Earlier this year, through a chance discovery, he was able to examine the computer programme, the source code, used in a voting machine made by Diebold, one of the largest manufacturing companies.

"The source code was very poorly written, it didn't have the kinds of controls in place that you would expect from a high-assurance system," Prof Rubin told BBC News Online.

An ordinary voter could alter the outcome of an election, he believes. ...

"Even more serious would be a rogue or malicious programmer working at Diebold who could put in some hidden functionality that could cause the outcome of the election to be later determined by the attacker," he says. ...

The complete article has much more background information, quoting arguments for and against electronic voting machines.

 
Christian Science Monitor
from the November 03, 2003 edition -

A better ballot?

Electronic ballots, hailed as the antidote to hanging chads, will make a mark on Election Day. But critics warn of risks to democracy.

By Mary Wiltenburg | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

The complete article is currently (3/28/04) available on the Christian Science Monitor website at-- http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1103/p11s02-uspo.html [found through a Google search by article title on the same date]

Excerpt--

...  A growing number of computer scientists are now warning that the new technology, far from solving America's voting problems, may actually make things worse. Electronic ballots can be miscounted too, they say - or the machines that tally them tampered with and traces of sabotage erased.

"If you look at the consequences for democracy, it's terrifying," says David Dill, a Stanford University computer-science professor who has led the charge to raise awareness about the machines' potential security flaws. "If we had a way to make [computerized voting] safe, believe me, we would. There's no way to run a reliable election without a verifiable paper trail - that's what these machines don't have." ...

The complete article includes  "From quill to touch screen: a US history of ballot-casting"

www.csmonitor.com | Copyright 2003

 FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.