News and Opinion for Democrats Against Bush -- Part I a
Bush Governs As If He Had a Resounding Mandate
PT. I a - HOME PAGE
PT. I a - CONTENTS
--- BUSH-HATERS?
GEORGE BUSH
--- No Mandate!
--- Basic Dishonesty
--- Documented Lies
------ And More Lies
------ on Education
------ on Small Bus.
------ On Medicare
--- Limited Worldview
--- Arrogance
--- Ignorance
--- Real Agendas
--- Anti-Choice Dogma
--- 20 Questions
THE RADICAL RIGHT
------ Relig. Oppos'n
--- John Ashcroft
--- Dick Cheney
--- Spreading AIDS
--- 10 Commandments
--- Far-Right Terrorists
WAR AGAINST WOMEN
--- Global Gag Rule
THE RADICAL RIGHT . . is ANTI-REPUBLICAN
........says a Republican
--- Conservative Revolt
CONSERVATIVE BIAS in the MEDIA
------ Fox Network
--- Liberals Fight Back
--- Now, Liberal Radio
------ Al F. vs. Rush L.
------ Timing Is Ripe
BUSH ADMINISTRAT'N
--- 50 Lies of Admin.
------ Pt. 1. Strategy
------ Pt. 2. Language
------ Pt. 3. Targets
------ Pt. 4. Programs
--- Inflexibility
--- Secretiveness
------ EPA and FDA
--- Orwellian Aspects
--- Demoniz'g Oppon'ts
--- Silencing Democrats
--- Corporate Influence
--- Not Protect'g Public
------ Few Regulations
--- Destroying Medicare
--- Attacking Unions
--- Bad Fiscal Policy
------ Deficit Lies
--- Looting the Future
--- Iraq Policies
------ "Fog Machine"
--- Radio Free Europe
--- Wilson Leak
------ Swept Under Rug
--- "Compassionate"??
BUSH ADMINISTRATION is ANTI- STATES' RIGHTS
--- Environment
--- Church vs. State
--- Gay Marriage
--- Predatory Lenders
BUSH ADMIN. vs. SCIENCE
DEPT. of AGRICULTURE
-- Mad Cow Disease
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
--- Illegally Influenced
FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
--- Corruption in FDA
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
--- Anti States' Rights
------ Assisted Suicide
------ Death Penalty
--- Overriding Judges
-- Now, Secret Trials
FEDERAL BUREAU of INVESTIGATION
--- Surveillance
--- vs. Bush Opponents
BUSH AND THE COURTS
--- Judge Choice Crucial
------ Judicial Nominees
------ Republican Lies
--- Ashcroft Interferes
--- Expand DNA Dbase?
2004 CAMPAIGN
--- Financing Tricks
--- Corruption in Cong.
FAIR USE NOTICE -- This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been sp
"The conventional wisdom was that he had to move to the center to build a governing coalition and that he had to fulfill his promises to be a compassionate conservative and to have America act as a humble superpower."  --Newsday.com
 
"President Bush took office with no perceptible mandate for radical change in foreign policy. Yet, immediately upon assuming the presidential mantle, he set about reversing nearly every major foreign policy initiative that carried the Clinton imprint. "  --Washington Post
Newsday.com
 
Incurious George:  Bush's Weaknesses Are Beginning to Show
 
 

October 12, 2003
 
 
Quote

Almost three years into the presidency of George W. Bush the startling political reality is that, although he was elected by the slimmest of margins and lost the popular vote by more than 500,000 votes, he has governed as if he had a resounding mandate.

The conventional wisdom was that he had to move to the center to build a governing coalition and that he had to fulfill his promises to be a compassionate conservative and to have America act as a humble superpower.

Instead Bush has followed a steady right-wing course ...

Copyright © Newsday, Inc.

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/ny-vpuno123491049oct12,0,7275779.story?

washingtonpost.com

Get Foreign Policy Back On Course

By Warren Christopher

Thursday, November 27, 2003; Page A43

The complete article is currently (4/7/04) available on the Washington Post website at--  http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A16771-2003Nov26?language=printer   [found through a Google search by article title, via a link on the Clark for President website at http://www.forclark.com/comments/2003/11/27/15512/963/19/post]

Excerpt--

...  Under normal circumstances, a change of party controlling the White House does not produce a turnabout in the nation's foreign policy. While new administrations may make minor course corrections, especially on specific issues raised in the campaign, they typically discover that they agree more than disagree with their predecessors' foreign policy goals and approaches.

In the case of the current administration, however, fundamental departures from existing foreign policy have been the norm from the outset. President Bush took office with no perceptible mandate for radical change in foreign policy. Yet, immediately upon assuming the presidential mantle, he set about reversing nearly every major foreign policy initiative that carried the Clinton imprint. ...

In sum, the United States launched a preemptive war without convincing evidence that Iraq constituted an imminent threat to our nation and without any effective plan for dealing with the aftermath of a military victory. ...

The writer was secretary of state from 1993 to 1997. He is co-chairman of the Pacific Council on International Policy.

© 2003 The Washington Post Company

.

 FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .