|
Here are links to two TV news reports from our April 21, 2007 Protest/Rally
and March at Santa
Monica Airport.
Channel 2 http://www.cbs2.com/video/?id=38003@kcbs.dayport.com
Los Angeles
Times
Airing concerns about jets
Protesters at Santa Monica Airport say larger craft are a health and safety hazard.
By Carla
Hall, Times Staff Writer April 22, 2007
It was sunny and breezy at
Santa Monica Airport on Saturday, a great day for flying — and for protesting flying.
A
few hundred local residents and several politicians held a midday rally in front of the dark glass of the airport's administrative
offices (closed on weekends) to decry the environmental and safety hazards of the increasingly busy airfield. Not far in the
distance, the objects of their protest — gleaming private jets — roared into the sky.
"The fact that the
jets came in so dramatically in the last 10 to 15 years and there's no buffer zone is a serious issue," said Los Angeles City
Councilman Bill Rosendahl, whose district includes the parts of L.A. that border the airport and who, like
some of the other speakers, stood before the crowd with a gas mask around his neck.
"We have to let everybody know
we're not going to tolerate it anymore!"
The crowd erupted in applause — which was quickly drowned out by a jet.
A
low drone of boos rose up from the group.
"That's one of our friendly neighbors," Martin Rubin, one of the
event's organizers, deadpanned.
Rubin, founder and director of Concerned Residents Against Airport Pollution,
said toxic fumes from idling jets harm residents' health and that the lack of buffers for out-of-control jets leaves residents
— some of whom live less than 300 feet from the runway — vulnerable to possible crashes. According to activists,
90% of the fumes waft toward Los Angeles.
The rally, which was followed by a march on Bundy Avenue, is part of an intensive campaign waged for years by Santa Monica citizens. The airport was
originally designed for slower, smaller aircraft. The community has no problem with the propeller planes that people see as
they drive into the airport. At issue are the larger private jets whose traffic has skyrocketed with the advent of fractional
jet usage — in which travelers buy a partial interest in a type of jet, entitling them to a number of hours of flying
time.
"When people moved into these neighborhoods … they didn't have the pollutants coming out of these jets,"
Rosendahl said.
The city of Santa Monica has been criticized for not fighting the jet traffic at the airport, which is regulated
by the Federal Aviation Administration.
"Their reaction when they get pushed is they're sympathetic, but they don't
take action," said Marcia Hanscom, vice chairman of conservation for the Angeles Chapter of the Sierra Club.
Santa
Monica City Councilman Kevin McKeown said he wants the council to toughen its stance. "I regret the jets coming in and out
of this airport," he said. "We also are battling with the FAA."
Air quality was a big issue at the rally. "Jet Setters,
You're Killing Us" read one demonstrator's sign. Some wore surgical masks over their mouths.
Rosendahl believes that
bigger jets should not be allowed at Santa Monica Airport and should be funneled instead to Van Nuys or Los Angeles International airports.
Assemblyman Ted Lieu (D-Torrance)
told the crowd he had introduced a bill, AB 700, that would require the state to complete a study of air pollution caused
by jets and turboprops taking off and landing at Santa Monica Airport.
*
carla.hall@latimes.com
Staff
writer Sam Quinones contributed to this report.
###
LOS ANGELES CITY BEAT Jet Fuel
Follies 4-26-07 Jets flying
out of tiny Santa Monica Airport create more and more toxic fumes
~ By ANA LA O’ ~
To read the full story you will need to go to:
www.lacitybeat.com/
The Argonaut -
April 26, 2007
Protesters demonstrate against aircraft
nuisances at airport
BY GARY WALKER
Against the backdrop of rumbling jet engines, dozens of
energized, sign-waving protesters held a boisterous demonstration against aircraft nuisances at Santa
Monica Airport Saturday, April 21st.
The
rally to protest runway safety, airplane noise and air pollution took place one day before Earth Day, which demonstration
organizer Martin Rubin felt was very befitting.
Click here to read the full article.
The SANTA MONICA MIRROR
From Main News: April 26 - May 2, 2007
Air Pollution Demonstration at SMO
Terence Lyons, Mirror Staff Writer
Air pollution from jet aircraft
operations at Santa Monica Airport (SMO) was the focus of a demonstration Sunday, April 22,
by local residents and several politicians.
Click here to read the full article.
The LookOut News - April 23, 2007
Airport
Neighbors Protest Jet Traffic
By Gene Williams
Staff Writer April 23 -- Airport neighbors, hoping to ban jet
planes in Santa Monica,
carried picket signs and covered their mouths with filter masks Saturday at an Earth Day weekend demonstration outside the
airport's administration building.
Click here to read the full story.
Palisadian-Post
News in Brief: Temescal Oversight to SM Airport
April 25, 2007
Max Taves, Staff Writer
Protesters Decry Noise, Air Pollution at SM
Airport
Hundreds of residents concerned about safety and affected by noise
and air pollution at Santa
Monica Airport protested last Saturday. Fueled by the growth of private jets and debated federal safety standards, jet operations
at the airport have increased 1,400 percent since 1983.
As previously reported in the Palisadian-Post (?Airplane Noise Upsets
Hillside Calm,? December 15), that explosion in jet traffic has angered residents of Santa Monica
and Pacific Palisades, especially those living atop the Palisades? highest streets.
Airport protesters on Saturday, including Los Angeles City Councilmember
Bill Rosendahl, said that neighboring communities are flooded with dangerous pollutants, unwanted noise and
a safety hazard, reported the Los Angeles Times. They want the Federal Aviation Administration to enforce tighter safety standards
at the airport, which would reduce the number of large jets that now land at the airport. They also want an environmental
report that studies health effects.
###
Santa Monica Daily Press
Saturday/Sunday, July 22/23, 2006
City officials should stop idling on airport.
Guest Column by
Martin Rubin
Click here to download this edition, and go to page #5
Related
story:
Santa Monica Daily Press – Wednesday, May 31, 2006
All eyes on the city’s airport pollution issue.
Guest Column by
Martin Rubin
Click here to download this edition, and
go to page #4
The LookOut news – July 12, 2006 State Airport
Bill Grounded By Olin Ericksen, Staff Writer Click here to go to the article.
Los Angeles Times June 22, 2006
Foes of Bigger Airport Consider Legal Action
Residents
and school district officials speak after the city approves an environmental report for expansion. Click here to read more.
By Nancy
Wride, Times Staff Writer June 22, 2006
Los Angeles Times June 22, 2006
Jet-Setters Stir Up Turbulence at Santa Monica Airport
Surging
traffic at the airfield has neighbors feeling besieged
By Martha
Groves, Times Staff Writer June 22, 2006
Residents who
live near Santa
Monica Airport know it's Academy Awards season by the pickup in jet traffic zooming
over their houses.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger routinely jets in and out on state business.
Tom Cruise once had to outrun
paparazzi who chased him down the tarmac as he tried to board his private jet.
"Everybody from the president of the
United States to people who own small, single-engine planes and everybody in between flies
out of here," said airport Manager Robert D. Trimborn.
Nestled amid some of the nation's priciest real estate, Santa Monica Airport offers a convenient launch pad for well-heeled Westsiders and corporate bigwigs
who crave quick getaways.
Its growing clientele includes executives who favor $20-million Citation X and $35-million
Gulfstream IV jets. A strong economy and post-9/11 security concerns have helped boost jet usage at the airport nearly fourfold
over the last decade.
But as the single-runway facility gets busier, residents who live around it are becoming increasingly
worried about noise, air pollution and safety.
They contend that it's only a matter of time before an out-of-control
plane smashes past the end of the 5,000-foot runway and roars into the houses beyond, some a mere 250 feet west.
Turbulence
from casino magnate Steve Wynn's jet bowled over and smashed to bits a glass-topped patio table in the backyard of Virginia Ernst, who lives just east of the airport in Los
Angeles.
"We were able to identify
the plane immediately," she said.
Wynn's attorney dealt with the situation, paying Ernst $3,000.
Ernst says
she can look directly into the engines as jets take off. It sometimes seems, she says, that "they're going to land on the
roof."
Other residents agree. Yoram Tal, a TV show editor who has lived just west of the airport for about four years,
said he is "right in the line of fire" as jets take off and land.
Late one night, Tal, a small-plane pilot and Santa Monica airport commissioner, realized that he "could see not only the wing but the windows above the wing" as a jet took
off. "It was no more than 200 feet from my bed," he said. "It was loud, but more than loud it was just really close."
Residents,
backed by Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Los Angeles) and other politicians, say they want buffer zones at both ends of the runway
that would help protect the neighborhood if a jet overshot the tarmac. Such a buffer would most likely spell the end for certain
faster aircraft (including, possibly, the Gulfstream IV, Cessna Citation X and similar planes).
In the past, the Federal
Aviation Administration has resisted, saying the airport could operate safely without them. But in recent months, the FAA
has softened that stance and is negotiating with the airport to find a compromise, such as installing engineered material
like soft concrete that would slow a runaway aircraft.
In recent years, Santa Monica's airport
has seen a dramatic increase in jet takeoffs and landings. One factor is the growth in fractional ownership. More companies
and individuals are buying shares of jets, entitling them to a certain number of flying hours. A quarter share, for example,
would represent 200 "occupied hours" over the aircraft's lifetime. With a $10-million plane, the share would cost $2.5 million.
"Our
business grows every year," said Glenn A. Hinderstein, a vice president of NetJets Inc., a fractional ownership company that
operates out of Santa Monica and other airports. It is owned by Berkshire Hathaway, the company headed by
investment sage Warren E. Buffett, a pioneer in the field.
Passengers can arrive by limousine in ripped jeans and T-shirts,
board a jet and be whisked away in a matter of minutes.
In addition to Schwarzenegger, who lives nearby, neighbors
over the years have spotted such celebrity jet-setters as John Travolta, Don Johnson, Bill Cosby, Merv Griffin, Robert Redford
and Cruise.
The roughly 18,000 yearly
jet-aircraft operations (as takeoffs and landings are known) at Santa Monica Airport — up from fewer
than 1,200 in 1983 — account for about 13% of the airport's traffic. They are about evenly split between jets that are
generally slower and smaller and those that are faster and larger.
The airport was designed, decades ago, for slower,
smaller aircraft with approach speeds of less than 121 knots (136 mph). Over time, however, the fleet mix has gradually shifted
until now the fastest aircraft fly in at speeds as great as 185 mph. They account for about half of the jets using the facility.
For these
faster planes, FAA standards call for runway safety areas (similar to runaway-truck ramps on steep roads and highways). In
an emergency, a plane can enter the safety area without damaging the aircraft or injuring those on board.
The FAA,
however, determined some time ago that the Santa Monica Airport could safely operate without these end-of-runway areas, as long
as pilots followed proper procedures.
Despite that assurance, residents and the city, backed by Waxman, have persisted
in pushing for safety zones. They note that neither end of the existing east-west runway has any sort of buffer to give an
out-of-control plane extra room to stop.
"The basic issue here is that the airport is embedded in a residential neighborhood,"
said Cathy Larson, who lives in Sunset Park at the airport's western edge. "If a larger aircraft, like a Gulfstream IV, were to overrun,
it would end up plowing through several homes and causing not just monetary damage but loss of life."
A number of small-plane
crashes have occurred over the years in the vicinity of Santa Monica Airport. In March, television game show host Peter Tomarken and his wife,
Kathleen, died when his single-engine plane crashed into Santa Monica
Bay soon after departure.
Although residents agree that safety
is the highest priority, noise is by far the biggest irritant. The airport's noise ordinance is strict, but, commissioner
Tal said, the noise levels are sometimes violated. First-time offenders, who account for many of the violations, get off with
a warning. Repeat offenders usually pay their fines.
Then there is air pollution. Los Angeles residents who live just
east of the airport say they take the brunt of a tremendous amount of soot, odors and fumes from the jet traffic, particularly
as aircraft rev up before departure.
"The jet kerosene is so thick it's like having 10 school buses parked in front
of your house," said Martin Rubin, founder and director of Concerned Residents Against Airport Pollution, an activist group.
Regional air quality officials recently installed pollution-monitoring
equipment in one resident's yard.
The airport has been the focus of years of battles, especially after jets began
using it. At one point, the Santa Monica City Council voted to close the facility, then finally agreed in 1984 to a settlement
with the FAA that kept it open but imposed strict noise rules.
Some general aviation pilots who have long used Santa Monica Airport lament how the fancy planes have changed the feel of the once homey
airfield.
"The character of the place has changed," said entrepreneur Stephen Wyle, who is sometimes accompanied by
his son, actor Noah Wyle, in his small plane.
"When they started letting jets in, it became much more of a corporate,
business destination," he added.
*
Times staff
writer Jennifer Oldham contributed to this report.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-jetset22jun22,0,4381685.story
FREE
VENICE BEACHHEAD June, 2006
Getting a grasp on a greased pig - by Martin Rubin
Click here to read just this article.
Or Click here to download PDF of this issue (big download) and go to page seven.
The LookOut news – June 2, 2006 Airport Bill
Flies without Amendments By Olin Ericksen, Staff Writer Click here to go to the article.
Santa Monica Daily Press – Wednesday, May 31,
2006
All eyes on the city’s airport pollution issue.
Guest Column by
Martin Rubin
Click here to download this edition, and go to page #4
The LookOut
news
Airport Bill Gains Momentum By Olin Ericksen
Staff Writer
May 18, 2006 -- The Los Angeles City Council Wednesday threw its weight behind a controversial effort to
gauge possible air pollution blowing from Santa Monica Airport
into adjacent neighborhoods. Read more...
The Argonaut May 18, 2006 Mar Vista
Community Council supports Ted Lieu's bill
BY VINCE ECHAVARIA
By Olin Ericksen Staff Writer
May 9 -- A State bill that would force Santa Monica Airport to keep
statistics to help gauge the effects of aircraft pollution on the health of nearby residents is receiving a turbulent response
from local officials, despite vocal backing by key Los Angeles and California legislators. Read more...
The
Argonaut April 27, 2006
Santa Monica
Airport: Concerned Residents speak up about airport pollution;
politicians say they share feelings
BY ANITA VARGHESE
|