|
Film Flubstm Frequently Asked Questions |
| What's the most frequently-seen Flub? | |
| What's your favorite Flub? | |
| What Flubs are you bored to death hearing about? | |
| Isn't there a person on the set who's supposed to catch all the errors? | |
| Why are there mistakes in the Film Flubs books? | |
| Have any directors, writers, producers or actors given you grief for pointing out their mistakes? | |
| What's the difference between the Film Flubs books and your newest book, Reel Gags? | |
| Why is there material from your earlier books in Roman Soldiers Don't Wear Watches and Film Flubs 1999? | |
| Why isnt there an index in Roman Soldiers Dont Wear Watches? | |
| When will there be a new Film Flubs and/or Reel Gags book? |
What's the
most frequently-seen Film Flub? It has to be the appearance of the boom mike.
The interesting thing is that while one person may see a boom mike in a shot, another may
not, depending on where you see the film. The "masking" of the film (the
frame around the screen) can be different from one theater to another, exposing the boom
mike sometimes, covering it in others. Often, even though you don't see the mike in
the theaters, you might see it on video, since the conversion of a movie to video picks up
a little extra space at the bottom and top of the frame. At any rate, if you see it,
it's a Flub. For a more in-depth explanation, see Film Flubs 1999, Pages
3-14.
What's your
favorite Film Flub? It's sorta like asking a parent, "Which is your favorite
child?" Actually, I love em all. If I had to pick a favorite, it
would probably be the one in North by Northwest (see Roman Soldiers Dont
Wear Watches, p. 171), where a little kid in the background puts his fingers in his
ears before Eva Marie Saint fires the shot at Cary Grant. Wanna hear
something funny? The publishers put that picture in the book backwards. The
kid is actually on the right side of the screen.
What Flubs
are you bored to death hearing about? The alleged "Munchkin
suicide" in The Wizard of Oz (no, it didnt happen. See Pages vii,
ix in Film Flubs 1999) and the "ghost of a kid" in Three Men and a
Baby (cmon. Get real. A kid didnt die in the apartment in New
York where it was filmed. It was filmed on a set on a sound stage in Toronto.
See Roman Soldiers Dont Wear Watches, Pages 177-80).
Isnt
there a person on the set whos supposed to catch all the errors? There are
crew members called Script Supervisors, whose job it is to catch the little glitches
before they are committed to film. If they werent there, an amazing number of
goofs could be seen in the final film. They catch the collars buttoned/unbuttoned,
props moved from one day to the next, even the difference between a cloudy and a sunny sky
from one part of the day to the next. But they, too, are human and they slip up
occasionally. The filming of a movie is an enormously complex process, involving
hundreds and hundreds of people. There are many, many places where an error can
creep into the process, long after shooting on the set is completed. Each
"craft" (costumers, set decorators, etc.) is responsible for its own continuity,
and its up to the director to watch over the entire process. He or she is the
final filter, and if a mistake shows up on screen, its ultimately the
directors fault. However, some mistakes emerge even after the director has
gone over the film with a fine-toothed comb, especially when the director doesnt
have the right of "final cut" and some studio "suit" re-edits the film
and creates a mistake in the process.
Why are there
mistakes in the Film Flubs books? Because, just like movies, books are
made by human beings, who make mistakes. Just because I write books about movie
mistakes, it doesnt mean that theyre perfect. Also, just as in movies,
mistakes happen in the writing, editing, and publishing process. Then theres
just plain carelessness, which Im guilty of from time to time. There are
things that book editors accidentally overlook. And, for whatever reason, there are
corrections that just dont get made. Having learned of a few of my own goofs
plus some made by the publisher in Film Flubs, Son of Film Flubs, and Film
Flubs: The Sequel I marked them for correction in Roman Soldiers Dont Wear
Watches. Due to a production glitch, they didnt get corrected.
Cest la vie. Life goes on. But its embarrassing, and it
shouldnt happen.
Have any
directors, writers, producers or actors given you grief for pointing out their mistakes?
Oddly enough, never. They seem to enjoy the spirit of the books. The point of
view is not "tabloid journalism," e.g, "Look at the awful things these
stupid people have done." Nope, its more "Youll have a lot of
fun finding these little glitches, most of which are insignificant, in your favorite
films." Many, many of the Flubs covered in the books have been given to me by
famous directors, writers, and actors. Ill meet them at some industry
function, and theyll tell me to look for a certain flub in their own film.
They arent necessarily proud of the mistakes; its just that they know the Film
Flubs and Reel Gags books will treat them with humor, and that the books
reflect an overriding love of movies and respect for all the people who move them along
the way from idea to finished film.
Whats
the difference between your newest book Reel Gags, and the Film Flubs books?
The Film Flubs series point out slip-ups, goofs, gaffes, and other mistakes that
shouldnt have happened. They slipped into the films at some point due to
carelessness on someones part at some point in the production process. On the
other hand, Reel Gags looks at things that are slipped into the films
deliberately. Theyre inside jokes like naming characters for a writer and/or
directors friends (or enemies!), using family members in a scene, directors
appearing in their own films, directors trademarks, and special little jokes
in signs, props, or other things in the background. It also includes a
"Wheres Alfred" section which lists Alfred Hitchcocks appearances in
his own films, and a tribute to the Worlds Worst Director (you think were
gonna tell you about him here? Think again. Buy the book!).
Why is there
material from your earlier books in Roman Soldiers Dont Wear Watches and Film
Flubs 1999? A couple of reasons. For one thing, books have a
certain shelf life in bookstores. Nowadays, more than ever before, as soon as sales
start declining, the bookstores replace the books with faster-selling titles. The
first three books, Film Flubs, Son of Film Flubs, and Film Flubs: The Sequel
are hard to find in most bookstores these days. If we put out an edition that had
only material from newer films, much of the fun thats contained in the earlier books
would be lost to newer audiences. So we get around that problem by including
material from older editions in the newer ones, along with newly-discovered flubs in
recent films and a few oldies we hadnt heard about before. Roman Soldiers
Dont Wear Watches contains about half of the material from the earlier books; Film
Flubs 1999 contains the rest. Buy these two and youll have the entire
collection.
Why isnt
there an index in Roman Soldiers Dont Wear Watches? It was a
decision by the publisher, with which we vehemently disagreed. So that tells you
just how much influence a writer has. But we made one ourselves, because most people
want to look up flubs in a specific movie if theyve just seen or rented it.
Soon we'll have a downloadable index on the Web site. Check back for it.
When will there
be a new Film Flubs and/or Reel Gags book? Its up to
you! As long as they keep selling, well keep writing them. But this
isnt a charity. As much fun as we have with the books, we have to keep a roof
over our head, pay the bills, and buy the groceries (and none of the above is cheap in
California!). Show your support by purchasing the books at your favorite bookstore
(or order them online from Amazon.com or Barnesandnoble.com using the book links on this
website), keep sending us the flubs or inside jokes that you spot (click here for an e-mail form), and well
keep the assembly line rolling!
© Copyright 1999 Bill Givens