The Episcopal Church Network for Science, Technology & Faith
NEWSLETTER
Vol. 1-3, Trinity Sunday 2002
-Headlines-
-
Seminary of the Southwest Hosts Science-and-Religion Series
-
Phina Borgeson Elected to the Network Steering Board
-
Minutes of the Steering Board Meeting
-
Tips in Effective Writing for Science/Religion Committees
-
What Every Christian Should Know about Quantum Mechanics
-
Review of God, Humanity & the Cosmos
Seminary of the Southwest Hosts Science-and-Religion Series
The Episcopal Theological Seminary of the Southwest, (ETSS), co-sponsored two science-and-religion lectures in Austin, Texas, this spring, together with the Austin Presbyterian Seminary. Professor Frank N. Bash, who teaches at the University of Texas and
directs its prestigious McDonald Observatory, presented the lectures on April 24 and 25.
The two seminaries, just blocks apart from each other and north of the University of Texas campus, are observing anniversaries of their foundings this year. The Presbyterian seminary is celebrating its centennial, while the Episcopal seminary is marking its fiftieth year. The two presented Dr. Bash's lectures as part of their anniversary celebrations.
Dr. Bash, who joined the University of Texas faculty in 1967, has research interests in large-scale structure of spiral galaxies and star formation on large scales. He was named Frank N. Edmonds Regents Professor in 1985 and in 1989 became director of the university's world-class McDonald Observatory in West Texas. The observatory produces the popular "StarDate" radio report.
For further information on these presentations, contact Mr. Bob Kinney, Communications Director at EETSS.
-back to top-
Phina Borgeson Elected to the Network Steering Board
The Rev. Phina Borgeson (Diocese of Northern California) is the newest member of the Steering Board of the Network. A deacon with a background in biology, she currently serves as Director of the Faith Network Project for the National Center for Science Education, Oakland, California (NCSE).
The Board welcomes her experience in adult education design, ministry development, and organizational development. In addition to her work with NCSE, she is currently designing a distance-learning course in science and religion for the Church Divinity School of the Pacific, Berkeley (CDSP).
Borgeson will serve as a consultant to the Executive Council Committee on Science, Technology and Faith. Its Subcommittee on Creation welcomes her professional connection with NCSE.
click for a larger image
The Network Steering Board is a subcommittee of the Executive Council Committee on Science, Technology and Faith.
(See organizational chart.)
Above, left to right: Dr. Robert Schneider, W. North Carolina (Records Secretary); Dr. Neil James, Florida (Committee consultant); the Rev. Tony Jewiss (General Convention staffperson to the Committee); the Rev. Dr. Norman Faramelli, Massachusetts (Committee); the Rev. Dr. Kendall Harmon, South Carolina (Committee); the Rev. Barbara Smith-Moran, Massachusetts (Convener); the Rev. Dr. J. John Keggi, Maine (Membership Secretary); Ms. Susan Youmans, Massachusetts (Committee); the Rev. Phina Borgeson, N. California (newly elected Member at Large); the Rev. Dr. Peter Arvedson, W. New York (Communications Officer); Dr. Sandra Michael, C. New York (Member at Large); Mr. Milton Coleman, C. New York (Treasurer).
-back to top-
Minutes of the Steering Board Meeting
- The meeting of the Subcommittee on the Ecumenical Roundtable was called to order on Friday, 12 April, The Galt House, Louisville, Kentucky, Barbara Smith-Moran and Robert Schneider chairing at different times.
- Reports were received from the Membership Secretary and the Treasurer. The Treasurer suggested a postal appeal for the payment of dues.
- The electronic newsletter, voted at the meeting last April, has been launched, with Barbara Smith-Moran as editor. Two issues are now available in the internet (Advent 2001 and Epiphany 2002). Suggestions for improved format, content and distribution were offered.
- Phina Bergeson, was elected unanimously to fill a vacant position for At-large Member on the Steering Board. (See article above.)
- The bylaws were amended and approved. The brochure text was corrected and reprinting was approved for distribution as before (to cathedrals and seminaries, and for meetings of the General Convention, AAAS, and other organizations).
Discussion was opened regarding suggestions about what our Church ought to be taking notice of--what the Executive Council Committee on Science, Technology and Faith ought to consider taking up for further study. The following topics were put forward:-
stewardship of creation and environmental issue, e.g., global warming
-
behavioral genetics
-
the court system's interpretion/use of science; justice and junk science; the
reputation of scientists as witnesses
-
the Precautionary Principle
-
simple, non-academic theology and science for parish education, for feeding and pushing to grow
-
prayers and other elements of liturgy that are both literary and scientifically informed
-
scientifically sound sermon-starters
-
the whole cluster of issues around disparagement of science by preachers
-
resources to help people read science and not abuse it in the treatment of contemporary issues; tools rather than canned material from the media, who go for the headline and the polarization of issues
-
a column in Network Newsletter and/or reviews of junk science books
-
speakers bureau
-
use of the Network Newsletter to respond to national and international news
-
finding community on the internet; cyberpriests
-
the growing trend to take your whole office with you on vacation, as phones, computers, printers get smaller and smaller
-
cell phones and public manners, public display of private lives
-
effects of communication technology on relationships, privacy
-
the implications of technology for the church and its mission
-
inwardness and egoism
-
the unintended, unforeseen consequences of technology, including those distant in time and space; pastoral component
NOTE: Network members and other readers are encouraged to email additions to this list to Communications Officer The Rev. Dr. Peter Arvedson, S.O.Sc.
-back to top-
Tips in Effective Writing for Science/Religion Committees
In mid-April, the science-and-religion committees from several Christian denominations in Canada and the U.S. met for the annual Ecumenical Roundtable on Science Technology and the Church. Hosted in Louisville, Kentucky, by the Presbyterian Church (USA) delegation, the Roundtable heard a presentation planned by the Episcopal Church Network. Since education and communication are priorities in the mission across all the committees, the Network invited Mr. Jim DeLa, Director of Communications for the Diocese of Southwest Florida, to present a plenary talk and lead a break-out practicum on effective writing. He conveyed a wealth of insight from his experience with the secular and religious presses, and everyone enjoyed his relaxed presentation, sense of humor, and know-how. Following is a sampling of DeLa's wisdom.
Two questions to ask at the outset:
(1) What do you want to say?
(2) Whom do you want to say it to?
The average reader craves simplicity, clarity, and understanding, so:
(a) focus, focus, and more focus;
(b) narrow your subject matter down tightly;
(c) simplify.
The "fog index" provides a measure of what level you want to write for the audience you will be writing for. Take a typical passage of about 100 words (ending at a period); count the number of sentences, colons, and semicolons in the passage, and divide that into the number of words (to get the average sentence length). To that number, add the number of words of more than two syllables in the passage. Multiply that sum by 0.4 to get the "fog index." Aim for 7-8.
For reference, the average newspaper comes out about 6-7; Time, about 8; The Atlantic, 13 or higher; the Bible, 5-6. (There is a "fog index calculator" and some other tips, Jim tells us, at the University of Minnesota Policy Library
.)
Don't edit your own copy; it is easy to overlook mistakes in grammar and spelling.
In writing for the web, articles should be shorter than those one finds in a printed source.
Suggestions for content of parish newsletters: (a) have parishioners submit questions; (b) provide partial answers in a short statement; (c) list web sites, different sites for different subjects; (d) on controversial topics, move from polarization to discussion and dialogue.
Four goals for communication:-
to inform: teach something new
-
to enlighten: explain the reasons for the new information
-
to entertain: make it painless
-
to inspire: motivate the reader to greater interest or action
Left to right: Dr. Karl Peters (Unitarian Universalist Association), Dr. Neil James (Episcopal Church), Dr. Derek Pursey (Presbyterian Church), the Rev. Barbara Smith-Moran (Episcopal Church), Mr. Jim DeLa (guest speaker).
Click for larger image
-back to top-
To learn more about the Ecumenical Roundtable on Science, Technology and the Church, see their website at URL http://www.pcs.cnu.edu/~khoffman/ELCA/RT_Purpose.html.
What Every Christian Should Know about Quantum Mechanics
[Fresh religious insights are often found by reference to the language and metaphors of other disciplines, especially the sciences. St. Andrew's Church in Framingham, Mass., recently hosted such a cross-disciplinary "fertilization" opportunity, led by Network member Paul Bamberg, Senior Lecturer on Mathematics, Harvard University. He has kindly provided us with his notes below, including the caveat.]
Beware: the author is a well-trained physicist and and mathematician but has no credentials in theology. Understand the physics, then draw your own theological conclusions!
Issues to be considered:-
1. Quantum mechanics and statements that appear self-contradictory (e.g., waves, particles, and the dual nature of light and matter)
-
2. What does it mean to "know everything?"
-
Probability in classical physics
-
Probability in quantum physics
-
Does God really "play dice with the universe"?
-
Might God have access to "hidden variables"?
-
3. Can a system be observed without influencing it?
-
a. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle
-
b. The importance of "indistinguishable alternatives"
Question for discussion: Of the following statements, what do 2) and 3) have in common?-
1) Karo syrup is completely colorless and extremely sticky.
-
2) Jesus Christ was both fully human and fully divine.
-
3) Light behaves both exactly like a wave and exactly like a particle.
-
4) Jesus Christ was a devout Jew and a skilled carpenter.
References:-
From the Book of Common Prayer: Definition of the Union of the Divine and Human Natures in the Person of Christ, according to the Creed of Saint Athanasius
-
From Richard Feynman's Lectures on Physics, Volume 1: chapter 37 ("Quantum Behavior"), and chapter 38 ("The Relation of Wave and Particle Viewpoints")
Lecture demonstrations:-
a. The wave nature of sound: interference between two loudspeakers
-
b. The wave nature of light: Young's double-slit experiment
-
c. The particle nature of light: photoelectric effect
-
d. Random events and particle detection: Geiger counter with beta and gamma sources
-
e. Energy levels: fluorescence of minerals and quinine water
Questions for Dr. Bamberg? Send them by email to the Newsletter Editor.
-back to top-
Review of God, Humanity and the Cosmos
[The following review by Barbara Smith-Moran was written for The Living Church.]
God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion, written by Christopher Southgate (also the Coordinating Editor), Celia Deane-Drummond, Paul D. Murray, Michael Robert Negus, Lawrence Osborn, Michael Poole, Jacqui Stewart, and Fraser Watts. Trinity International, 1999. Pp 449. $35 paper.
Over the past five years, general interest in how science interacts with faith claims has increased markedly. And those interactions are anything but static. Study of them has become a burgeoning sub-field or specialty within religion departments and at seminaries, and Anglican thinkers, particularly those in the U.K., continue to play leading roles in the research and development of theology in light of contemporary science.
Mirroring this interest within the wider culture, adult education groups in an widening circle of congregations of all faiths discuss the viewpoints of science and religion in such areas as health and healing, nature and stewardship, and genetics and ethics. God, Humanity and the Cosmos represents an important contribution toward promoting an ease and fluency in the current science-and-religion discussions. While it will find use primarily in undergraduate and seminary-level courses, this book is quite suitable for individual and parish reading, particularly those with some prior experience in thinking about and discussing such matters.
A number of factors recommend it for wide usage. First of all, it is eminently readable, owing to the careful (and gender-inclusive) writing of an excellent group of authors, who also serve as editors for each other. Coordinating Editor Christopher Southgate, who himself is trained in both biochemistry and theology, has gathered a team of writers, all of them British, and most with dual training in theology and one of the social or natural sciences. The often deadly theological lingo--a proven repellant for scientists venturing into discussion with theologians--is deftly avoided. Neither do the authors assume any special scientific vocabulary and training in their readers. This is a team with sound teaching skills; it includes science educator Michael Poole, known for his lavishly illustrated, anything-but-dry books and pamphlets on science and religion for an inquisitive lay audience.
Secondly, the thorough index and use of cross-referencing allow readers to start anywhere their interest takes them. The first section provides historical and philosophical overviews, but readers might wish to plunge right into the discussions about "Dolly" and cloning. Any concept covered earlier or later in the book is marked with a section number to guide the reader to help, if desired.
Finally, the authors have built in a versatility to enable to book to be used in a variety of settings. The material is divided into four main sections, each of which can stand alone for the convenience of those teaching mini-courses or leading short-term discussion groups. Following the first section of introductory material, Section Two includes examples of how physics, evolutionary biology and psychology interact with religious claims. Section Three holds particular importance, as it surveys contemporary thought--Christian and that of other faiths--about God's relationship with the earth and cosmos, and with humankind, in particular. It provides good resources for individuals and congregations formulating Jubilee (or other faithful) responses as to the crisis of the planet's health. Section Four examines science's place in society: science education and values, Islam and science, technology in the light of theology and ethics.
This argument is central: for the sake of the health of the creation God loves, humankind included, religious thought cannot be considered to occupy some cultural compartment of its own, isolated from science and technological development. They have interacted for ages, and, to quote Wentzel van Huyssteen (Princeton Theological Seminary) from his Foreword, religion continues to unfold "in new and creative ways as a direct response to a culture so definitively shaped today by science and technology."
-back to top-
All Network Newsletter materials may be reproduced with proper attribution.
Revised: 30 May 2002
Send comments and news items to the Network Newsletter editor,
The Rev. Barbara Smith-Moran, S.O.Sc.
http://home.earthlink.net/~smithmoran/stfnewsletter1-3.html
Editor's homepage